“…Unfortunately, retroviruses are often inactivated by this procedure, presumably because shear forces cause the retrovirus envelope proteins to separate from the virus particles, giving rise to virus particles that are no longer fusogenic. Numerous alternatives to ultracentrifugation as a means to purify retrovirus have been developed, including low-speed centrifugation, size-exclusion membrane filtration, affinity chromatography, and complexation with calcium phosphate, cationic polymers, or paramagnetic beads (Bowles et al, 1996;Burns et al, 1993;Coleman et al, 2003;Darling et al, 2000;Gatlin et al, 2001;Hughes et al, 2001;Kuiper et al, 2002;Miller et al, 1996;Paul et al, 1993;Reiser, 2000;Scherr et al, 2002;Yamada et al, 2003;Yang et al, 2002;Ye et al, 2004;Zelenock et al, 1997;Zhang et al, 2001). Although each of these approaches are capable of concentrating retrovirus stocks and improving gene transfer, they do not increase the number of genes transferred to the same extent that the virus stocks are concentrated, which suggests that these virus processing methods co-concentrate inhibitors (Le Doux et al, 1998;Seppen et al, 2000) or directly reduce the ability of the viruses to transduce cells.…”