Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
We compute the drag force on a sphere settling slowly in a quiescent, linearly stratified fluid. Stratification can significantly enhance the drag experienced by the settling particle. The magnitude of this effect depends on whether fluid-density transport around the settling particle is due to diffusion, to advection by the disturbance flow caused by the particle, or due to both. It therefore matters how efficiently the fluid disturbance is convected away from the particle by fluid-inertial terms. When these terms dominate, the Oseen drag force must be recovered. We compute by perturbation theory how the Oseen drag is modified by diffusion and stratification. Our results are in good agreement with recent direct-numerical simulation studies of the problem at small Reynolds numbers and large (but not too large) Froude numbers.Key words: Recent direct-numerical simulation studies of the problem (Yick et al. 2009;Zhang et al. 2017) explored how the drag depends on the importance of diffusivity versus advection, and upon the degree of density stratification. Our goal is to explain their results by perturbation theory, assuming that both Re and Ri are small but finite.Chadwick & Zvirin (1974b,a) analysed this question, but for a sphere moving horizontally in a quiescent non-diffusive stratified fluid, along surfaces of constant fluid density.Here we study the settling problem, where the particle settles vertically along the fluiddensity gradient, so that it crosses the surfaces of constant density. The two problems are quite different: when the particle moves horizontally, the streamlines of the flow tend to encircle the sphere in the horizontal plane. When the sphere moves vertically, by contrast, light fluid is pushed down into regions of larger fluid density, giving rise to complex disturbance-flow patterns (Ardekani & Stocker 2010).Neglecting effects of convective fluid inertia, the difference between horizontal and vertical motion was compared earlier. When density transport is entirely diffusive, the additional drag due to stratification is five times larger in the vertical than in the horizontal direction (Candelier et al. 2014). When density advection dominates, the vertical drag is seven times larger than the horizontal one (Zvirin & Chadwick 1975).Despite these qualitative and quantitative physical differences, the horizontal and vertical problems share an important mathematical property: regular perturbation expansions fail to describe the effects of convective fluid inertia and buoyancy due to stratification even if these perturbations are weak. Therefore so-called 'singular-perturbation' methods are required to solve the problem. We use the standard method of asymptotic matching (Saffman 1965), where inner and outer solutions of the disturbance problem are matched, describing the disturbance flow close to and far from the particle.We parameterise the effect of convective inertia and stratification in terms of length scales: the particle radius a, the Oseen length o = a/Re, and the stratification length s ...
We compute the drag force on a sphere settling slowly in a quiescent, linearly stratified fluid. Stratification can significantly enhance the drag experienced by the settling particle. The magnitude of this effect depends on whether fluid-density transport around the settling particle is due to diffusion, to advection by the disturbance flow caused by the particle, or due to both. It therefore matters how efficiently the fluid disturbance is convected away from the particle by fluid-inertial terms. When these terms dominate, the Oseen drag force must be recovered. We compute by perturbation theory how the Oseen drag is modified by diffusion and stratification. Our results are in good agreement with recent direct-numerical simulation studies of the problem at small Reynolds numbers and large (but not too large) Froude numbers.Key words: Recent direct-numerical simulation studies of the problem (Yick et al. 2009;Zhang et al. 2017) explored how the drag depends on the importance of diffusivity versus advection, and upon the degree of density stratification. Our goal is to explain their results by perturbation theory, assuming that both Re and Ri are small but finite.Chadwick & Zvirin (1974b,a) analysed this question, but for a sphere moving horizontally in a quiescent non-diffusive stratified fluid, along surfaces of constant fluid density.Here we study the settling problem, where the particle settles vertically along the fluiddensity gradient, so that it crosses the surfaces of constant density. The two problems are quite different: when the particle moves horizontally, the streamlines of the flow tend to encircle the sphere in the horizontal plane. When the sphere moves vertically, by contrast, light fluid is pushed down into regions of larger fluid density, giving rise to complex disturbance-flow patterns (Ardekani & Stocker 2010).Neglecting effects of convective fluid inertia, the difference between horizontal and vertical motion was compared earlier. When density transport is entirely diffusive, the additional drag due to stratification is five times larger in the vertical than in the horizontal direction (Candelier et al. 2014). When density advection dominates, the vertical drag is seven times larger than the horizontal one (Zvirin & Chadwick 1975).Despite these qualitative and quantitative physical differences, the horizontal and vertical problems share an important mathematical property: regular perturbation expansions fail to describe the effects of convective fluid inertia and buoyancy due to stratification even if these perturbations are weak. Therefore so-called 'singular-perturbation' methods are required to solve the problem. We use the standard method of asymptotic matching (Saffman 1965), where inner and outer solutions of the disturbance problem are matched, describing the disturbance flow close to and far from the particle.We parameterise the effect of convective inertia and stratification in terms of length scales: the particle radius a, the Oseen length o = a/Re, and the stratification length s ...
We derive analytically the angular velocity of a spheroid, of an arbitrary aspect ratio $\kappa$ , sedimenting in a linearly stratified fluid. The analysis demarcates regions in parameter space corresponding to broadside-on and edgewise settling in the limit $Re, Ri_v \ll 1$ , where $Re = \rho _0UL/\mu$ and $Ri_v =\gamma L^3\,g/\mu U$ , the Reynolds and viscous Richardson numbers, respectively, are dimensionless measures of the importance of inertial and buoyancy forces relative to viscous ones. Here, $L$ is the spheroid semi-major axis, $U$ an appropriate settling velocity scale, $\mu$ the fluid viscosity and $\gamma \ (>0)$ the (constant) density gradient characterizing the stably stratified ambient, with the fluid density $\rho_0$ taken to be a constant within the Boussinesq framework. A reciprocal theorem formulation identifies three contributions to the angular velocity: (1) an $O(Re)$ inertial contribution that already exists in a homogeneous ambient, and orients the spheroid broadside-on; (2) an $O(Ri_v)$ hydrostatic contribution due to the ambient stratification that also orients the spheroid broadside-on; and (3) a hydrodynamic contribution arising from the perturbation of the ambient stratification whose nature depends on $Pe$ ; $Pe = UL/D$ being the Péclet number with $D$ the diffusivity of the stratifying agent. For $Pe \ll 1$ , this contribution is $O(Ri_v)$ and orients prolate spheroids edgewise for all $\kappa \ (>1)$ . For oblate spheroids, it changes sign across a critical aspect ratio $\kappa _c \approx 0.41$ , orienting oblate spheroids with $\kappa _c < \kappa < 1$ edgewise and those with $\kappa < \kappa _c$ broadside-on. For $Pe \ll 1$ , the hydrodynamic component is always smaller in magnitude than the hydrostatic one, so a sedimenting spheroid in this limit always orients broadside-on. For $Pe \gg 1$ , the hydrodynamic contribution is dominant, being $O(Ri_v^{{2}/{3}}$ ) in the Stokes stratification regime characterized by $Re \ll Ri_v^{{1}/{3}}$ , and orients the spheroid edgewise regardless of $\kappa$ . Consideration of the inertial and large- $Pe$ stratification-induced angular velocities leads to two critical curves which separate the broadside-on and edgewise settling regimes in the $Ri_v/Re^{{3}/{2}}$ – $\kappa$ plane, with the region between the curves corresponding to stable intermediate equilibrium orientations. The predictions for large $Pe$ are broadly consistent with observations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.