2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Reynolds number aerodynamics of leading-edge and trailing-edge hinged control surfaces: Part I statics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forces on the LE control surface give rise to multiple complexities of nonlinear nature. The LE deflections were crucial mostly during higher values for the angle of attack [15] [16]. Experiments carried out to determine the efficiency and aerodynamic effects of these leading edge flaps have shown that the geometrical structure and the positioning of these flaps play a pivotal role during operations at high angles of attack.…”
Section: B Control Surfaces and Aerofoil Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forces on the LE control surface give rise to multiple complexities of nonlinear nature. The LE deflections were crucial mostly during higher values for the angle of attack [15] [16]. Experiments carried out to determine the efficiency and aerodynamic effects of these leading edge flaps have shown that the geometrical structure and the positioning of these flaps play a pivotal role during operations at high angles of attack.…”
Section: B Control Surfaces and Aerofoil Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further trailing edge hinged control surface was found to be more effective as compared to leading edge hinged. 36 Readers are requested to consult these writings in the subject of flight dynamics focusing MAVs design, manufacturing, maneuverability analysis, aerodynamic performance analysis, and flight stability. [37][38][39][40] Where there are many advantages of miniaturization, small-sized MAVs have a low mass moment of inertia, and therefore are susceptible to either small pilot input or an atmospheric gust which lead to unstable flight.…”
Section: Microaerial Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Here, Zα is calculated as U o Zw, and Zw is evaluated as depicted in equation (36). Since e Z u and f Z w terms has contributions from Z u cos θ, Z u sin θ, Z w cos θ, and Z w sin θ, phugoid mode behavior is more realistic physically; therefore, the proposed methodology is seemed to be a better representation of longitudinal flight modes as compared to the conventional methodology as adopted in Ref.…”
Section: Fight Characterization-natural Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a single alula or asymmetrically arranged alulae are used, roll can be controlled, with an efficiency one order of magnitude better than traditional flaps and ailerons, as shown in Figure 10. The alula could produce a maximum roll moment of 0.036, which is better than the control force of a −20° flap aileron [23][24][25]. Subsequently, Linehan et al [26] constructed a sliding-alula wing (SAW) and carried out a wind-tunnel experiment.…”
Section: Bionic Application Of the Alulamentioning
confidence: 99%