2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/eusipco.2017.8081265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low resource point process models for keyword spotting using unsupervised online learning

Abstract: Abstract-Point Process Models (PPM) have been widely used for keyword spotting applications. Training these models typically requires a considerable number of keyword examples. In this work, we consider a scenario where very few keyword examples are available for training. The availability of a limited number of training examples results in a PPM with poorly learnt parameters. We propose an unsupervised online learning algorithm that starts from a poor PPM model and updates the PPM parameters using newly detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more information on the proposed see Jansen and Niyogi (2009c), Jansen and Niyogi (2009b). Sadhu and Ghosh (2017) describe how to apply this approach in systems with limited resources using unsupervised online learning.…”
Section: Unconventional Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For more information on the proposed see Jansen and Niyogi (2009c), Jansen and Niyogi (2009b). Sadhu and Ghosh (2017) describe how to apply this approach in systems with limited resources using unsupervised online learning.…”
Section: Unconventional Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FOM (Gish et al, 1990;Rose and Paul, 1990;Naylor et al, 1992;Zeppenfeld and Waibel, 1992;Chang and Lippmann, 1994;Gish and Ng, 1993;Rohlicek et al, 1993;Knill and Young, 1996;Junkawitsch et al, 1997;Zheng et al, 1999;Szöke et al, 2005;Lehtonen, 2005;Jansen and Niyogi, 2009a,c;Szöke et al, 2010;Tabibian et al, 2011;Bohac, 2012;Sangeetha and Jothilakshmi, 2014;Sadhu and Ghosh, 2017;Tabibian et al, 2018) EER (Szöke et al, 2010;Bohac, 2012) Accuracy (Morgan et al, 1990Ida and Yamasaki, 1998;Ge and Yan, 2017;Benisty et al, 2018;Fernández-Marqués et al, 2018) FA/kw/h (Rohlicek et al, 1989;Vroomen and Normandin, 1992;Feng and Mazor, 1992;Leow et al, 2012;Kavya and Karjigi, 2014) ROC (Marcus, 1992;Siu et al, 1994;Keshet et al, 2009;Wöllmer et al, 2009bWöllmer et al, , 2013Shokri et al, 2013;Sadhu and Ghosh, 2017;Kumatani et al, 2017) Detection rate (Feng and Mazor, 1992;Khne et al, 2004;…”
Section: Metrics Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more information on the proposed, see Jansen and Niyogi (2009b). Sadhu and Ghosh (2017) described how to apply this approach in systems with limited resources using unsupervised online learning.…”
Section: Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%