2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-resolution face recognition with single sample per person

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We follow the experiment setting provided in [73] and [59] and study both closed-set and open-set scenarios. For closed-set evaluation, 180 subjects are used and for open set evaluation, we compare our result with the performance reported in [59] with the HD-1m HD-2.6m HD-4.7m SCface [14] 6.18% 6.18% 1.82% CLPM [35] 3.08% 4.32% 3.46% SSR [82] 18.09% 13.2% 7.04% CSCDN [75] 18.97% 13.58% 6.99% CCA [76] 20.69% 14.85% 9.79% DCA [16] 25.53% 18.44% 12.19% C-RSDA [11] 18.46% 18.08% 15.77% Centerloss [77] [35] 29.12% SDA [91] 40.08% CMFA [64] 39.56% Coupled mapping method [63] 43.24% LMCM [87] 60.40% Centerloss [77] D. Low-resolution face re-identification In this section, we explore LR face re-identification and evaluate it on several datasets captured in an unconstrained environment. We employ the VBOLO dataset for an in-depth study and the SCface, UCCSface, and MegaFace challenge 2 LR subset for other topical explorations.…”
Section: Low-resolution Face Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow the experiment setting provided in [73] and [59] and study both closed-set and open-set scenarios. For closed-set evaluation, 180 subjects are used and for open set evaluation, we compare our result with the performance reported in [59] with the HD-1m HD-2.6m HD-4.7m SCface [14] 6.18% 6.18% 1.82% CLPM [35] 3.08% 4.32% 3.46% SSR [82] 18.09% 13.2% 7.04% CSCDN [75] 18.97% 13.58% 6.99% CCA [76] 20.69% 14.85% 9.79% DCA [16] 25.53% 18.44% 12.19% C-RSDA [11] 18.46% 18.08% 15.77% Centerloss [77] [35] 29.12% SDA [91] 40.08% CMFA [64] 39.56% Coupled mapping method [63] 43.24% LMCM [87] 60.40% Centerloss [77] D. Low-resolution face re-identification In this section, we explore LR face re-identification and evaluate it on several datasets captured in an unconstrained environment. We employ the VBOLO dataset for an in-depth study and the SCface, UCCSface, and MegaFace challenge 2 LR subset for other topical explorations.…”
Section: Low-resolution Face Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next research in 2017 [12] proposed a cluster-based regularized simultaneous discriminant analysis (C-RSDA) based on SDA. Next year in 2018 [13] proposed a method called low-rank representation and locality-constrained regression (LLRLCR) to learn occlusion-robust representation features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the identification of a human face may imply the recognition of the invariant structure of aspects in dynamic environments of our daily life [ 13 ]. The most ecological environments will be related to low viewing conditions [ 28 ], in terms of lighting [ 29 ] or distance [ 30 ], among others. One of the most interesting variants that can include all the variables described above is the movement or the position of presentation and a face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%