1971
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(71)80346-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-renin essential hypertension—another form of childhood hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, primary hypertension was not described in the pediatric age group until 1971, when Gruskin and colleagues reported a 5-year-old girl with significantly elevated BP and a completely negative evaluation for secondary causes of hypertension [1]. Thus, at least until recently, primary hypertension has been considered a diagnosis of exclusion in children, and most recommendations for the evaluation of childhood hypertension still state that this diagnosis should only be made after an extensive evaluation for secondary causes, especially in younger children [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, primary hypertension was not described in the pediatric age group until 1971, when Gruskin and colleagues reported a 5-year-old girl with significantly elevated BP and a completely negative evaluation for secondary causes of hypertension [1]. Thus, at least until recently, primary hypertension has been considered a diagnosis of exclusion in children, and most recommendations for the evaluation of childhood hypertension still state that this diagnosis should only be made after an extensive evaluation for secondary causes, especially in younger children [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Even in settings where BP is monitored in children, an abnormal BP for that child can go unrecognized. 15 Since the first reported occurrence of childhood-onset essential hypertension in 1971, 16 an increasing number of children are being diagnosed with it. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] The prevalence of hypertension (primary and secondary) in screened children is reported between 4.5% 22,27 and 13% 28 In the pediatric population, where secondary causes for hypertension are more prevalent than in adults, the prevalence of essential hypertension remains unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, urinary concentrations of Ang-(1-7) were inversely correlated with blood pressure [97]. Regarding pediatric patients, a limited number of studies only evaluated the levels of PRA and the results are quite variable and occasionally inconclusive [6,71,[98][99][100], although some of them suggested that an abnormal RAS activation could be involved in different forms of hypertension [6,71,99,100]. Our research team has recently reported significant differences among circulating Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels in pediatric patients with renovascular disease and essential hypertension [101].…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, hypertension can be classified as secondary to an identifiable disease or as primary, also called essential or idiopathic, in which no obvious subjacent etiology can be detected [3][4][5]. In fact, primary hypertension was not reported in the pediatric age group until 1971, when Gruskin and collaborators published a case of a 5-year-old girl [6]. In fact, primary hypertension was not reported in the pediatric age group until 1971, when Gruskin and collaborators published a case of a 5-year-old girl [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%