2016
DOI: 10.1190/geo2015-0183.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-rank one-step wave extrapolation for reverse time migration

Abstract: Reverse time migration (RTM) relies on accurate wave extrapolation engines to image complex subsurface structures. To construct such operators with high efficiency and numerical stability, we have developed a one-step wave extrapolation approach using complex-valued low-rank decomposition to approximate the mixed-domain space-wavenumber wave extrapolation symbol. The low-rank one-step method involves a complex-valued phase function, which is more flexible than a real-valued phase function of two-step schemes, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One family of high resolution algorithms for solving the anisotropic acoustic wave equation free of S-wave artifacts falls under the so-called spectral approach (Etgen & Brandsberg-Dahl 2009;Du et al 2010;Fomel et al 2013;Alkhalifah 2014;Song & Alkhalifah 2013;Wu & Alkhalifah 2014;Sun et al 2016). They are based on approximately separating the space-and wavenumber-dependency of the dispersion relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One family of high resolution algorithms for solving the anisotropic acoustic wave equation free of S-wave artifacts falls under the so-called spectral approach (Etgen & Brandsberg-Dahl 2009;Du et al 2010;Fomel et al 2013;Alkhalifah 2014;Song & Alkhalifah 2013;Wu & Alkhalifah 2014;Sun et al 2016). They are based on approximately separating the space-and wavenumber-dependency of the dispersion relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods such as the pseudo‐spectral (Kosloff and Baysal ; Sun et al . ), finite‐element (Eriksson and Johnson ), spectral elements (Komatitsech et al . ), discontinuous Galerkin (Chung and Engquist ; De Basabe et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite-difference method (FDM) remains the most popular numerical method for seismic modelling because it is robust and relatively simple to implement, and it offers a good balance between accuracy and efficiency (Moczo et al 2007;Yang et al 2010;Virieux et al 2011;Liu 2013). Other methods such as the pseudo-spectral (Kosloff and Baysal 1982;Sun et al 2016a), finite-element (Eriksson * E-mail: 923458778@qq.com and Johnson 1991), spectral elements (Komatitsech et al 2000), discontinuous Galerkin (Chung and Engquist 2006;De Basabe et al 2008), finite-volume (Benjemaa et al 2007), and grid methods (Zhang and Liu 1999) are used to various extent in the geophysical community. Wave propagation simulation has attracted a renewed interest mainly because the so-called (acoustic or elastic) full-wave equation approaches have become a fundamental tool in seismic migration and waveform inversion, considering the new challenges in exploration, especially anisotropy (Operto et al 2009;Lisitsa and Vishnevskiy 2010;Bartolo et al 2015;Cheng et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular approximation to that is given by the perfectly matching layer (PML) boundary condition (Berenger 1994). Similar to Berenger (1994) and Sun et al (2016), we extend the domain and consider a function α(x) equal to zero in the original domain and positive in the extended part. From eq.…”
Section: O P T I M I Z E D E X Pa N S I O N B a S E D L O W-r A N K Mmentioning
confidence: 99%