2013
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2013.2249572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Rank Matrix Recovery From Errors and Erasures

Abstract: This paper considers the recovery of a low-rank matrix from an observed version that simultaneously contains both (a) erasures: most entries are not observed, and (b) errors: values at a constant fraction of (unknown) locations are arbitrarily corrupted. We provide a new unified performance guarantee on when the natural convex relaxation of minimizing rank plus support succeeds in exact recovery. Our result allows for the simultaneous presence of random and deterministic components in both the error and erasur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown [30]- [32] that exact recovery is possible via nuclear norm minimization, as soon as the number of observed entries exceeds the order of the information theoretic limit. This line of algorithms is also robust against noise and outliers [33], [34], and allows exact recovery even in the presence of a constant portion of adversarially corrupted entries [35]- [37], which have found numerous applications in collaborative filtering [38], medical imaging [39], [40], etc. Nevertheless, the theoretical guarantees of these algorithms do not apply to the more structured observation models associated with the proposed multi-fold Hankel structure.…”
Section: B Connection and Comparison To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown [30]- [32] that exact recovery is possible via nuclear norm minimization, as soon as the number of observed entries exceeds the order of the information theoretic limit. This line of algorithms is also robust against noise and outliers [33], [34], and allows exact recovery even in the presence of a constant portion of adversarially corrupted entries [35]- [37], which have found numerous applications in collaborative filtering [38], medical imaging [39], [40], etc. Nevertheless, the theoretical guarantees of these algorithms do not apply to the more structured observation models associated with the proposed multi-fold Hankel structure.…”
Section: B Connection and Comparison To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [31], [32] consider matrix completion -recovering a low-rank matrix from an overwhelming number of erasures. The work initiated in [33], and subsequently continued and extended in [34], [35] focuses on recovering a low-rank matrix from erasures and possibly gross but sparse corruptions. In the noiseless case, stacking all our samples as columns of a p × n matrix, we indeed obtain a corrupted low rank matrix.…”
Section: Organization and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the L1 model (3.7) is akin to a robust PCA (a.k.a principal component pursuit) for incomplete matrix A, see [3] for analysis and computation of (3.8) and [4] for a related convex model.…”
Section: L1 Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%