2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/eusipco.2017.8081291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low rank canonical polyadic decomposition of tensors based on group sparsity

Abstract: Abstract-A new and robust method for low rank Canonical Polyadic (CP) decomposition of tensors is introduced in this paper. The proposed method imposes the Group Sparsity of the coefficients of each Loading (GSL) matrix under orthonormal subspace. By this way, the low rank CP decomposition problem is solved without any knowledge of the true rank and without using any nuclear norm regularization term, which generally leads to computationally prohibitive iterative optimization for largescale data. Our GSL-CP tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the rank estimation of the tensor could be part of the overall optimization problem to fit the CPD model. Several techniques have been proposed to solve the rank estimation problem in the case of CPD such as the CORCONDIA [12], the minimum description length (MDL) [38], the Laplace Method [39], the cross-validation based method [13], the method for simultaneously estimating the rank and noise level [34], the quotient of differences in additional values [42] and the group-sparsity of the over-estimated loading matrices technique recently proposed in [28,55] which showed higher performance over the above mentioned techniques. Indeed, recent works [28,55] suggested to use a new group-sparsity of the over-estimated loading matrices of the considered tensor as a powerful way to optimally estimate the tensor rank.…”
Section: Tensor Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the rank estimation of the tensor could be part of the overall optimization problem to fit the CPD model. Several techniques have been proposed to solve the rank estimation problem in the case of CPD such as the CORCONDIA [12], the minimum description length (MDL) [38], the Laplace Method [39], the cross-validation based method [13], the method for simultaneously estimating the rank and noise level [34], the quotient of differences in additional values [42] and the group-sparsity of the over-estimated loading matrices technique recently proposed in [28,55] which showed higher performance over the above mentioned techniques. Indeed, recent works [28,55] suggested to use a new group-sparsity of the over-estimated loading matrices of the considered tensor as a powerful way to optimally estimate the tensor rank.…”
Section: Tensor Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been proposed to solve the rank estimation problem in the case of CPD such as the CORCONDIA [12], the minimum description length (MDL) [38], the Laplace Method [39], the cross-validation based method [13], the method for simultaneously estimating the rank and noise level [34], the quotient of differences in additional values [42] and the group-sparsity of the over-estimated loading matrices technique recently proposed in [28,55] which showed higher performance over the above mentioned techniques. Indeed, recent works [28,55] suggested to use a new group-sparsity of the over-estimated loading matrices of the considered tensor as a powerful way to optimally estimate the tensor rank. More precisely, authors in [28,55] showed that the mixed 2,1 -norm, as a mean to describe the group sparsity constraint, is a tighter complex envelop of the matrix rank function than the nuclear norm commonly used in this context.…”
Section: Tensor Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TQÃ [14], whereQ is a diagonal matrix with the r th diagonal element defined by +δ . The parameter δ is a small value to avoid division by zero and .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%