2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2010.12439
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Rank Approximations of Nonseparable Panel Models

Abstract: We provide estimation methods for panel nonseparable models based on low-rank factor structure approximations. The factor structures are estimated by matrixcompletion methods to deal with the computational challenges of principal component analysis in the presence of missing data. We show that the resulting estimators are consistent in large panels, but suffer from approximation and shrinkage biases.We correct these biases using matching and difference-in-difference approaches. Numerical examples and an empiri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a panel data model, the analyst observes many units over time. Works in this literature posit a low rank [23,11,70,30,10] or approximately low rank [9,5] linear factor model for potential outcomes over units and times (and even interventions [4]). Observed outcomes are interpreted as corrupted potential outcomes with idiosyncratic noise.…”
Section: Treatment Effects With Corrupted Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a panel data model, the analyst observes many units over time. Works in this literature posit a low rank [23,11,70,30,10] or approximately low rank [9,5] linear factor model for potential outcomes over units and times (and even interventions [4]). Observed outcomes are interpreted as corrupted potential outcomes with idiosyncratic noise.…”
Section: Treatment Effects With Corrupted Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recent exciting line of work that we build upon is that of panel data and matrix completion, see Amjad et al (2018Amjad et al ( , 2019; Arkhangelsky et al (2019); Bai and Ng (2019); Fernández-Val et al (2020); Athey et al (2021); Agarwal et al (2021c,a,b); Agarwal and Singh (2021). Some of these works allow for MNAR data and entries of a matrix to be deterministically missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also recent papers that use matrix completion methods for the purpose of treatment effect estimation in panel models with two-way heterogeneity, e.g. Athey, Bayati, Doudchenko, Imbens and Khosravi (2017) and Amjad, Shah and Shen (2018), Chernozhukov, Hansen, Liao and Zhu (2020), and Fernández-Val, Freeman and Weidner (2020. Those papers do not require the additive separability between the regressors and error term in (1), but as a result they also have to make stronger assumptions and employ more complicated estimation methods than we do here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%