2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12410-016-9373-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Radiation Dose Calcium Scoring: Evidence and Techniques

Abstract: Coronary computed tomography (CT) allows for the acquisition of thin slices of the heart and coronary arteries, which can be used to detect and quantify coronary artery calcium (CAC), a marker of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Despite the proven clinical value in cardiac risk prognostication, there remain concerns regarding radiation exposure from CAC CT scans. There have been several recent technical advancements that allow for significant radiation dose reduction in CAC scoring. This paper reviews t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding calcifications with HA density of 400 mg/cm 3 , it is suspected that the influences of low intensity (small w i ) and more pixels (large A i ) owing to partial volume effect on Agatston score cancelled each other out, so changing SD value or body size did not cause obvious variation in AS 400HA . By definition, reducing CT number threshold would increase the Agatston score, and vice versa . This phenomenon was also observed in our results, which was adapted to determine the optimal HU threshold for CAC scans undergoing various imaging conditions to ensure the quantification accuracy of calcium scoring from CAC scans reconstructed at 0.5‐mm slice thickness using IR relative to the conventional protocol.…”
Section: Relationship Between Image Quality and Agatston Scoressupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding calcifications with HA density of 400 mg/cm 3 , it is suspected that the influences of low intensity (small w i ) and more pixels (large A i ) owing to partial volume effect on Agatston score cancelled each other out, so changing SD value or body size did not cause obvious variation in AS 400HA . By definition, reducing CT number threshold would increase the Agatston score, and vice versa . This phenomenon was also observed in our results, which was adapted to determine the optimal HU threshold for CAC scans undergoing various imaging conditions to ensure the quantification accuracy of calcium scoring from CAC scans reconstructed at 0.5‐mm slice thickness using IR relative to the conventional protocol.…”
Section: Relationship Between Image Quality and Agatston Scoressupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As seen in Fig. , the Agatston scores from 108 IR measurements increased as decreasing kVp, which can be explained by the increase in CT number of calcifications at lower tube voltage . This phenomenon was observed in all calcification densities and was most obvious in the Agatston score of calcifications with HA density of 200 mg/cm 3 .…”
Section: Relationship Between Image Quality and Agatston Scoresmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimated radiation doses per one time CAC scan range from 0.8 to 10.5 (median of 2.3) mSv according to a study published in 2009 83) . Recent technical advancements, however, allow for significant reduction in the exposure to a one-time dose of as low as 0.2 mSv, which is lower than those of other screening test, such as mammography for breast cance r (0.7 mSv) or CT-scan for lung cancer (1–2 mSv) 84) . Nevertheless, screening for CAC using computed tomography should also consider the concomitant accumulation of exposures to ionizing radiation from other sources including iatrogenic sources.…”
Section: Other Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomically correct phantoms can be used in determining the effectiveness of new imaging techniques (95). For example, phantoms used in cardiac imaging can help validate the accuracy of CT calcium scoring and determine the need for correction factors when using different reconstruction algorithms (96). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%