2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low prevalence of bloodstream infection and high blood culture contamination rates in patients with COVID-19

Abstract: Purpose In the management of COVID-19, knowledge is lacking on the frequency of secondary bacterial infections and on how empirical antibiotic therapy should be used. In the present study, we aimed to compare blood culture (BC) results of a COVID-19 patient cohort with two cohorts of patients without detected COVID-19. Methods Using a retrospective cohort study design of patients subjected to BC in six tertiary care hospitals, SARS-CoV-2 positive patients from March 1 to April 30 in 2020 (COVID-19 group) wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
5
47
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 However, a study performed in Sweden detected a clinically relevant microbial growth in blood cultures in 6.5% of COVID-19-affected patients, which was significantly lower compared with 10.8% in the 2020 control group without COVID-19 (p<0.0001) and 10.4% in the 2019 control group without COVID-19 (p<0.0001). 48 These data coincide with a study conducted in the USA which found that the blood culture positivity rate was significantly lower for patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 when compared with those who did not and to those who were not tested (3.8%, 8.0% and 7.1%, respectively; p<0.001). 49 A rapid systematic review of 24 studies (3338 hospitalised paediatric and adult COVID-19 affected patients), that aimed to assess the available literature on the prevalence of bacterial infections in COVID-19 affected patients, showed that 3.5% (95% CI 0.4% to 6.7%) and 14.3% (95% CI 9.6% to 18.9%) of these patients suffered a bacterial co-infection or secondary infection, respectively, and that this was more common in those patients who were critically ill (8.1%, 95% CI 2.3% to 13.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…17 However, a study performed in Sweden detected a clinically relevant microbial growth in blood cultures in 6.5% of COVID-19-affected patients, which was significantly lower compared with 10.8% in the 2020 control group without COVID-19 (p<0.0001) and 10.4% in the 2019 control group without COVID-19 (p<0.0001). 48 These data coincide with a study conducted in the USA which found that the blood culture positivity rate was significantly lower for patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 when compared with those who did not and to those who were not tested (3.8%, 8.0% and 7.1%, respectively; p<0.001). 49 A rapid systematic review of 24 studies (3338 hospitalised paediatric and adult COVID-19 affected patients), that aimed to assess the available literature on the prevalence of bacterial infections in COVID-19 affected patients, showed that 3.5% (95% CI 0.4% to 6.7%) and 14.3% (95% CI 9.6% to 18.9%) of these patients suffered a bacterial co-infection or secondary infection, respectively, and that this was more common in those patients who were critically ill (8.1%, 95% CI 2.3% to 13.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…9,10,[14][15][16][17][18]20,23,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] , Streptococcus spp. 9,10,[15][16][17][18]20,23,27,29,34 , Escherichia coli 9,14,16,27,28,30,31,33,34 , Klebsiella spp. 9,10,12,15,16,18,22,24,27,28,31 , Enterococcus spp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, late infections with gram-positive bacteria were more common in COVID-19 compared to influenza patients. Of note, a large multi-center study from Sweden comparing bacterial growth in 15,103 blood cultures from COVID-19 patients with non-infected controls also found that the rate of infections with gram-positive bacteria was significantly higher in patients with COVID-19 (66% vs. 50%, p < 0.0001) 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%