1998
DOI: 10.1080/095530098141915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low predictive value of intrinsic fibroblast radiosensitivity for fibrosis development following radiotherapy for breast cancer

Abstract: A significant variation in intrinsic radiosensitivity of breast cancer patients' dermal fibroblasts was observed. However, the degree of radiosensitivity did not show a significant correlation with fibrosis development. This indicates that the use of fibroblast radiosensitivity will have a limited usefulness for predicting fibrosis following breast irradiation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clinically relevant because large patient-to-patient variation in radiation morbidity has been documented, even after RT with a fixed dose-fractionation schedule (Tucker et al, 1992;Bentzen et al, 1993;Bentzen, 1997). The data published so far on the cellular and molecular factors underlying acute or late tissue reactions appeared to be contradictory and suggest that there is no clear-cut relationship between cellular radiosensitivity and the risk of acute or late reactions; consequently, no test has been recommended up to now for predicting the risk or the severity of late reactions in breast cancer (Burnet et al, 1992;Brock et al, 1995;Jones et al, 1995;Johansen et al, 1996;Russell et al, 1998;Kiltie et al, 1999;Barber et al, 2000;Peacock et al, 2000;Oppitz et al, 2001). To confirm our first preclinical and retrospective studies on the correlation of radiation-induced CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte apoptosis (RTLA) and late side effects after RT (Ozsahin et al, 1997), we assessed prospectively RTLA by the prediction of individual intrinsic radiosensitivity of 399 consenting patients treated with curative RT for miscellaneous cancers (Ozsahin et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clinically relevant because large patient-to-patient variation in radiation morbidity has been documented, even after RT with a fixed dose-fractionation schedule (Tucker et al, 1992;Bentzen et al, 1993;Bentzen, 1997). The data published so far on the cellular and molecular factors underlying acute or late tissue reactions appeared to be contradictory and suggest that there is no clear-cut relationship between cellular radiosensitivity and the risk of acute or late reactions; consequently, no test has been recommended up to now for predicting the risk or the severity of late reactions in breast cancer (Burnet et al, 1992;Brock et al, 1995;Jones et al, 1995;Johansen et al, 1996;Russell et al, 1998;Kiltie et al, 1999;Barber et al, 2000;Peacock et al, 2000;Oppitz et al, 2001). To confirm our first preclinical and retrospective studies on the correlation of radiation-induced CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte apoptosis (RTLA) and late side effects after RT (Ozsahin et al, 1997), we assessed prospectively RTLA by the prediction of individual intrinsic radiosensitivity of 399 consenting patients treated with curative RT for miscellaneous cancers (Ozsahin et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because skin cancer is associated with UV radiation exposure, skin cancer patients were included as controls to ensure that they would not be assigned a high risk for radiation toxicity. Ethnic origins of the skin cancer patients were European (14) and Hispanic (1), and their average age was 38 years.…”
Section: Radiation-sensitive Patients and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultured skin fibroblasts from patients with acute radiation toxicity showed decreased survival after IR in some studies (13) but not others (14,15). Lymphocytes from patients with radiation toxicity showed a paradoxical decrease in IR-induced apoptosis (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Considerable efforts have been made to correlate normal tissue toxicity with cellular responses to ionising radiation (IR). However, no significant relationships have yet been found between fibroblast or lymphocyte cytotoxicity and acute (Geara et al, 1993;Brock et al, 1995;Johansen et al, 1996) or late (Russell et al, 1998;Peacock et al, 2000) normal tissue reactions to IR. However, normal cell radiosensitivity in some cases may be an important factor predictive of radiation therapy response as illustrated by West et al (2001) whose results showed that blood lymphocyte radiosensitivity (SF2) is a highly significant prognostic factor for the risk of developing late radiation morbidity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%