2011 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI 2011
DOI: 10.1109/isvlsi.2011.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Power Probabilistic Floating Point Multiplier Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This area ratio which corresponds to the error detection probability is obtained based on the fact that only duplicated parts and comparators in the new multiplier have error detection capability. Thus, for example, for k equal to 17 to 11850.8 um 2 in this design. It is clear that more error detection probability will be reached if a longer mantissa is used in the proposed design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This area ratio which corresponds to the error detection probability is obtained based on the fact that only duplicated parts and comparators in the new multiplier have error detection capability. Thus, for example, for k equal to 17 to 11850.8 um 2 in this design. It is clear that more error detection probability will be reached if a longer mantissa is used in the proposed design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous reduced-precision or bit truncation schemes [15][16][17][18] focused on reducing the power consumption in the mantissa multiplication block, due to the fact that it consumes the largest amount of power consumption in a floating-point multiplier. In [15], it is examined that how a software-based system can employ the minimal number of bits for mantissa and exponent in the floating-point hardware to reduce the power consumption while maintaining the program's overall accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods use approximate computing to come up with low-power designs. These methods are voltage over scaling (VOS) [11,26,45,55], biased VOS (BIVOS) [5,6,13,34,42,44], bit width reduction [15,50,54], cutting lower significant parts [36] and hardware simplification [16,21,36,42,43,59]. Majority of these techniques focused on adders, multipliers and their derivative systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Since carry out is not calculated for the lower part, ETA has better performance than a precise adder in terms of processing [15]. a Conventional MA, b Approximation 1 obtained by reducing some transistors from conventional MA, c Approximation 2 in which Sum = Cout, d Approximation 3 in which Cout has a more simplified circuit and Sum = Cout, and e Approximation 4 in which Cout = A and sum is calculated as in Approximation 1 speed, power and area consumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A design of a low power FP multiplier was investigated by Tong et al [10] this design includes truncation of hardware & a reduction of the bit width representation of the FP data. A probable FP multiplier design was given by Gupta et al [11]. as an energy efficient design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%