51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-3720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Power Operation and Plasma Characterization of a Qualification Model SPT-140 Hall Thruster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first test program investigated the performance and operation of the Development Model 4 (DM4) thruster at discharge powers of 0.23 to 6.0 kW, and observed stable operation and performance over this range [14]. The second test program repeated many of the same measurements on the flight-model Qualification Model 2 (QM002) thruster with similar results [15]. Recently, a study was carried out to examine the effects of facility background pressure on thruster performance [1] with the aim of predicting thrust in vacuum conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first test program investigated the performance and operation of the Development Model 4 (DM4) thruster at discharge powers of 0.23 to 6.0 kW, and observed stable operation and performance over this range [14]. The second test program repeated many of the same measurements on the flight-model Qualification Model 2 (QM002) thruster with similar results [15]. Recently, a study was carried out to examine the effects of facility background pressure on thruster performance [1] with the aim of predicting thrust in vacuum conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…13 and 14 show performance levels that are similar to what has been reported by SSL and Snyder. 12,13,14 Additionally, comparison of segment 1 and 2 results indicated almost identical performance levels, further confirming that the thruster's closed-loop operation results in similar thruster operation as open-loop operation. Table 4 presents a summary of the ratio of the discharge current, anode mass flow rate, and thrust between open-loop and closed-loop thruster operation.…”
Section: Spt-140 Thruster Integration Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Year observation" in a given population (Aschengrau and Seage, 2008), that is, time is intrinsic to the denominator in rate calculations 10 . For our purpose, we calculate spacecraft-time instead of person-time, which is accrued only when the spacecraft is launched and until it is retired or completely fails on orbit.…”
Section: -Year Rolling Average Anomaly Per Spacecraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors used two qualification models of the thruster, one to undergo qualification and acceptance testing and has accumulated several thousand hours of operation, and one to undergo plume characterization and other performance testing. The performance evaluation of the second model is discussed in Garner et al (2015) in which the authors conclude that the SPT-140 is a "viable candidate for NASA missions requiring power throttling down to low thruster input power". Dankanich et al (2009) develop a qualification standard for electric thrusters, which have very different lifetime qualification issues than chemical thrusters.…”
Section: Peculiarities and Limitations Of Observational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%