2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-01180-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low performance of prognostic tools for predicting death before dialysis in older patients with advanced CKD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(37) In previous French validation studies the Grams model was externally validated in a cohort of advanced CKD patients aged 75 years and older for the outcomes KRT and 'death without KRT'. (7,8) These studies reported a C-statistic of 0.64 and 0.65 for KRT and a Cstatistic of 0.68 and 0.70 for 'death without KRT' for the 2 and 4 year models, respectively. Our decision curve analysis showed that for most patients, using individualized risk thresholds has a higher potential clinical utility than using eGFR thresholds, though the eGFR<15 guideline also showed good performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(37) In previous French validation studies the Grams model was externally validated in a cohort of advanced CKD patients aged 75 years and older for the outcomes KRT and 'death without KRT'. (7,8) These studies reported a C-statistic of 0.64 and 0.65 for KRT and a Cstatistic of 0.68 and 0.70 for 'death without KRT' for the 2 and 4 year models, respectively. Our decision curve analysis showed that for most patients, using individualized risk thresholds has a higher potential clinical utility than using eGFR thresholds, though the eGFR<15 guideline also showed good performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, the Grams model has only been externally validated for the outcome KRT and death before dialysis and has yet to be validated for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and overall death. 4 , 7 , 8 Before use, external validation of prediction models is crucial in order to determine the accuracy in new patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guide nephrologists in their daily practice and the patients’ decisional process, prognostic scores have an increasingly important role to play. However, the scores developed have shown limited accuracy in the older adults ( 47 , 48 ). Furthermore, using mortality as the outcome of choice must be questioned in the older adults: (i) the mortality rate is very high in this population burdened by comorbidities and clinical frailty ( 2 ); older patients often place more importance on their quality of life than on life expectancy.…”
Section: Prospects For Renal Registries and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a recent review by Prouvot et al [8] found other four equations (SCHMIDT [9]; WEISS [10]; GOLDFARB [11]; LANDRAY [12]) predicting death before dialysis in CKD patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome 3 and the International Society of Nephrology 5 recommendations also highlight the interest of using prognostic scores to predict death or start of renal replacement therapy for shared medical decisions; the scores suggested are the GRAMS 6 and BANSAL 7 scores. Moreover, a recent review by Prouvot et al 8 found other four equations (Schmidt et al, 9 Weiss et al, 10 Goldfarb-Rumyantzev et al, 11 and Landray et al 12 ) predicting death before dialysis in CKD patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%