2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8cc02150c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-overpotential CO2 reduction by a phosphine-substituted Ru(ii) polypyridyl complex

Abstract: A Ru polypyridyl complex containing a phosphine donor promoted electrocatalytic CO2 reduction at a low overpotential. Mechanistic investigations revealed that the introduction of a phosphine donor at the trans position to the labile ligand is the key to reduce the overpotential for CO2 reduction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TOF was determined using equation from catalytic CVs: TOF=italicFvnp3RT0.4463ncat2icatinormalp2 where F is Faraday's constant (96485 C/mol), v is the scan rate employed (0.1 V/s), n p is the number of electrons involved in the non‐catalytic redox reaction ( n p = 1), R is the gas constant (8.314 J/K/mol), T is the temperature (293.15 K), and n cat is the number of electrons involved for the catalytic reaction ( n cat = 2 for the reduction of CO 2 to CO), i p and i cat are determined as the peak currents under Ar and CO 2 , respectively. As for complex 1 , the calculated TOF is 4.4 s −1 ( i cat / i p = 4.7) in MeCN solution at a potential of −1.85 V, which is higher than or comparable to that of many reported ruthenium molecular water oxidation catalysts, and 0.4 s −1 ( i cat / i p = 1.5) in THF solution at a potential of −1.94 V and a scan rate of 100 mV/s. As for complex 2 , the calculated TOFs are 0.3 s −1 ( i cat / i p = 1.2) in MeCN solution at a potential of −2.43 V and 0.2 s −1 ( i cat / i p = 0.9) in THF solution at a potential of −2.21 V at 100 mV/s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TOF was determined using equation from catalytic CVs: TOF=italicFvnp3RT0.4463ncat2icatinormalp2 where F is Faraday's constant (96485 C/mol), v is the scan rate employed (0.1 V/s), n p is the number of electrons involved in the non‐catalytic redox reaction ( n p = 1), R is the gas constant (8.314 J/K/mol), T is the temperature (293.15 K), and n cat is the number of electrons involved for the catalytic reaction ( n cat = 2 for the reduction of CO 2 to CO), i p and i cat are determined as the peak currents under Ar and CO 2 , respectively. As for complex 1 , the calculated TOF is 4.4 s −1 ( i cat / i p = 4.7) in MeCN solution at a potential of −1.85 V, which is higher than or comparable to that of many reported ruthenium molecular water oxidation catalysts, and 0.4 s −1 ( i cat / i p = 1.5) in THF solution at a potential of −1.94 V and a scan rate of 100 mV/s. As for complex 2 , the calculated TOFs are 0.3 s −1 ( i cat / i p = 1.2) in MeCN solution at a potential of −2.43 V and 0.2 s −1 ( i cat / i p = 0.9) in THF solution at a potential of −2.21 V at 100 mV/s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The PDI in complex 1 adopts an aromatized tridentate η 3 ‐N,N,N‐coordinated mode, which can store multiple electrons in its large delocalized π systems, and cooperates with the central Ru(II) ion for electrocatalysis, whereas the PDI ligand in complex 2 uses a dearomatized η 2 ‐C,N coordination pattern which cannot act as an electron reservoir . In addition, owing to the good π‐acceptor and soft σ‐donor properties, incorporating triphenylphosphine ligand into complex 1 with a central ruthenium ion may also have the influences of enhancing its catalytic activity for the reduction of CO 2 . To further verify this view, the complex [Ru(PDI) 2 ][PF 6 ] 2 (PDI = 2,6‐bis(4‐methoxyphenylmethylimine)pyridine) was prepared according to the literature, in which there is no phosphine ligand, and the binding mode of PDI is η 3 ‐N,N,N, just as in complex 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Success in this endeavor requires confronting the inherent stabilitya nd low thermodynamic value of CO 2 and would transform this ubiquitous waste product into av aluable feedstock. [15,16] Recently,p incer ligand-supported catalysts of Fe, Co, Ru, and Ir have been shown to have excellent activity and selectivity for hydrogenation of CO 2 . Furthermore, formic acid has been identified and explored as ap otential carrier of dihydrogen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, photocatalytic formation of formic acid, at wo-electron reductionp roduct of CO 2 ,w ould yield ac ommodity chemical and al iquid fuel. [15,16] Recently,p incer ligand-supported catalysts of Fe, Co, Ru, and Ir have been shown to have excellent activity and selectivity for hydrogenation of CO 2 . [1,2] Homogeneous catalysts have been developed for CO 2 reduction under both electrochemical and photochemical conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%