2009
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as an Adjunct to Thrombolysis in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of sICHs in the LMWH group supports a safer AC, whereas treatment with UFH seemed to be associated with sICH in propensity analysis. The heparin dosages and ICH rates in our cohort are in line with results from other studies and a similar LMWH regimen is used in both myocardial infarction and venous thromboembolic events with similar results, favoring LMWH with lower risk of hemorrhagic complications .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of sICHs in the LMWH group supports a safer AC, whereas treatment with UFH seemed to be associated with sICH in propensity analysis. The heparin dosages and ICH rates in our cohort are in line with results from other studies and a similar LMWH regimen is used in both myocardial infarction and venous thromboembolic events with similar results, favoring LMWH with lower risk of hemorrhagic complications .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although UFH may provide rapid effective AC, LMWH has a longer plasma half‐life and more stable and predictable dose response, and therefore has easier subcutaneous dosing and no need for laboratory monitoring . UFH has been replaced by LMWH in the treatment of several other medical conditions, due to better outcomes and safety . However, to our knowledge, no comparison between the safety and efficiency of UFH versus LMWH has been made in IVT‐treated patients with BAO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our current protocol advises a target of 2.0−2.5‐fold the baseline APTT levels and heparin dosing is adjusted by weight . At present, UFH has been replaced by low‐molecular‐weight heparin in most acute cardiac indications including ST‐elevation myocardial infarction .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 2 neutral meta-analyses of dalteparin, nadroparin, reviparin, parnaparin (LOE 5), 413,414 1 dalteparin supporting study using a surrogate end point (LOE 1), 415 and 3 neutral studies of LOE 1 416 for nandroparin 416 and parniparin. 417,418 Fondaparinux. One study demonstrated superiority in clinical outcomes when fondaparinux was compared with UFH in patients treated with fibrinolysis (LOE 1).…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%