2013
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/l27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Masses and High Redshifts: The Evolution of the Mass-Metallicity Relation

Abstract: We present the first robust measurement of the high redshift mass-metallicity (MZ) relation at 10 8 M/M ⊙ 10 10 , obtained by stacking spectra of 83 emission-line galaxies with secure redshifts between 1.3 z 2.3. For these redshifts, infrared grism spectroscopy with the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera 3 is sensitive to the R 23 metallicity diagnostic: ([O II] λλ3726, 3729 + [O III] λλ4959, 5007)/Hβ. Using spectra stacked in four mass quartiles, we find a MZ relation that declines significantly with de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
163
5
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
25
163
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the MZR has been well-determined at higher masses (M * > 10 9 M ) (Tremonti et al 2004), it is still not completely defined at lower masses, where it has been studied in the local Universe by Lee et al (2006), Zahid et al (2012b), and Andrews & Martini (2013), but tested at intermediate redshift (z < 1) with relatively small samples (e.g., Henry et al 2013;Ly et al 2014Ly et al , 2015Ly et al , 2016b.…”
Section: The Mass-metallicity Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the MZR has been well-determined at higher masses (M * > 10 9 M ) (Tremonti et al 2004), it is still not completely defined at lower masses, where it has been studied in the local Universe by Lee et al (2006), Zahid et al (2012b), and Andrews & Martini (2013), but tested at intermediate redshift (z < 1) with relatively small samples (e.g., Henry et al 2013;Ly et al 2014Ly et al , 2015Ly et al , 2016b.…”
Section: The Mass-metallicity Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the gas-phase metallicity (defined as the oxygen abundance, 12 + log(O/H)) is found to tightly correlate with stellar mass (e.g., Lequeux et al 1979;Tremonti et al 2004) up to high redshift (z ∼ 3.5, e.g., Maiolino et al 2008;Zahid et al 2012a;Cullen et al 2014;Troncoso et al 2014;Onodera et al 2016), with a relatively steep slope flattening above 10 10.5 M . The normalization of this mass-metallicity relation (MZR) appears to evolve to lower metallicities with increasing redshift at fixed stellar mass (Savaglio 2010;Shapley et al 2005;Erb et al 2006;Maiolino et al 2008;Mannucci et al 2009), while the slope, especially in its low-mass end, is still not constrained (e.g., Christensen et al 2012;Henry et al 2013;Whitaker et al 2014;Salim et al 2014). However, both the slope and normalization of the MZR have been found to strongly depend on the method used to derive metallicity (Kewley & Ellison 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local galaxies follow this relationship with an intrinsic scatter of ∼0.1 dex. The MZR has been confirmed at redshifts up to z ∼ 3.5 and has been observed to evolve with redshift, such that galaxies of a given stellar mass have lower metallicities at higher redshifts (e.g., Erb et al 2006;Maiolino et al 2008;Henry et al 2013;Maier et al 2014;Maseda et al 2014;Steidel et al 2014). The MZR is most commonly understood in terms of the interplay between star formation and gas flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A relatively tight correlation between metallicity and stellar mass (the mass-metallicity relation) has been investigated, with a redshift evolution reflecting the metal enrichment of galaxies over cosmic time (Tremonti et al 2004;Erb et al 2006;Maiolino et al 2008;Foster et al 2012;Xia et al 2012;Henry et al 2013;Sánchez et al 2013;Zahid et al 2013;Masters et al 2014;Steidel et al 2014;Yabe et al 2014;Maier et al 2015;Sanders et al 2015b). It has been shown that this massmetallicity relation originates from a more fundamental mass, metallicity, SFR relation (the fundamental metallicity relation), forming a tight surface in this 3D space (Mannucci et al 2010;Bothwell et al 2013;Lara-López et al 2013a;Stott et al 2013;Maier et al 2014;Nakajima & Ouchi 2014;de los Reyes et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%