2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.96.034511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-lying baryon masses using Nf=2 twisted mass clover-improved fermions directly at the physical pion mass

Abstract: The masses of the low-lying baryons are evaluated using an ensemble with two degenerate light twisted mass clover-improved quarks with mass tuned to reproduce the physical pion mass. The Iwasaki improved gluonic action is employed. The coupling constant value corresponds to a lattice spacing of a = 0.0938(3)(2) fm, determined from the nucleon mass. We find that the clover term supresses isospin symmetry breaking as compared to our previous results using N f = 2+1+1 twisted mass fermions. The masses of the hype… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

12
89
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
12
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…slightly below the actual physical value). The lattice spacing is a = 0.0938(3)(2) fm [63] and the lattice has 48 3 × 96 sites, corresponding to the spatial extent L of around 4.5 fm and m π L = 2.98. ETMC calculated bare quasi-PDF matrix elements for the unpolarized, helicity and transversity cases, but we concentrate only on the unpolarized one.…”
Section: Lattice Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…slightly below the actual physical value). The lattice spacing is a = 0.0938(3)(2) fm [63] and the lattice has 48 3 × 96 sites, corresponding to the spatial extent L of around 4.5 fm and m π L = 2.98. ETMC calculated bare quasi-PDF matrix elements for the unpolarized, helicity and transversity cases, but we concentrate only on the unpolarized one.…”
Section: Lattice Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that an extrapolation to the continuum, where the different definitions are expected to be consistent, is not carried out and the errors quoted are only statistical, this level of agreement is very satisfactory. For the renormalized strange and charm quark masses, we find m R s ¼ μ s =Z P ¼ 108.6ð2.2Þð5.7Þð2.6Þ MeV and m R c ¼ μ c =Z P ¼ 1.39ð2Þð7Þð3Þ GeV, where Z P is the pseudoscalar renormalization function determined nonperturbatively in the modified minimal subtraction scheme (MS) at 2 GeV [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational approach.-We use one gauge ensemble employing two degenerate (N f ¼ 2) twisted mass cloverimproved fermions [14,15] with masses that approximately reproduce the physical pion mass [16] on a lattice of 48 3 × 96 and lattice spacing a ¼ 0.0938ð3Þ fm, determined from the nucleon mass [17]. The strange and charm valence quarks are taken as Osterwalder-Seiler fermions [18,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…c (cud, 1/2 ± ) and Ξ +,0 c (csu or csd, 1/2 ± ) [38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Assuming that the charm quark is a spectator, we can estimate the mass differences among the diquarks from those of the baryons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%