2010
DOI: 10.1364/oe.18.011089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-loss surface-plasmonic nanobeam cavities

Abstract: One-dimensional surface-plasmonic nanobeam cavities are proposed as a means to confine surface plasmons to a subwavelength-scale mode volume, while maintaining a relatively high Q-factor. By bonding one-dimensional photonic-crystal nanobeam structures to a low-loss metallic substrate, a clear plasmonic TM bandgap can be formed. The introduction of a single-cell defect alongside the engineering of side-air-hole shifts to this plasmonic-crystal nanobeam provides subwavelength-scale plasmonic mode localization wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field distribution along the z direction in Figure 2(c) indicates the distinct hybrid plasmon-photonic origin [29] of these cavity modes. In contrast to the plasmonic-photonic crystal nanobeam cavities [25] (Figure 2(e) and (f)), the hybrid SP3C nanobeam cavities (Figure 2(b) and (c)) show stronger field confinement in their narrow silica regions. Their maximum electric fields move to the boundary between the silica and the silicon, instead of the original location at the interface between the silver and the silicon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The field distribution along the z direction in Figure 2(c) indicates the distinct hybrid plasmon-photonic origin [29] of these cavity modes. In contrast to the plasmonic-photonic crystal nanobeam cavities [25] (Figure 2(e) and (f)), the hybrid SP3C nanobeam cavities (Figure 2(b) and (c)) show stronger field confinement in their narrow silica regions. Their maximum electric fields move to the boundary between the silica and the silicon, instead of the original location at the interface between the silver and the silicon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A high Q (theoretically ~1800) plasmon whispering-gallery microcavity at room temperature was realized [24], but the modal volume of this cavity was very large (30-50 μm 3 ) compared with that of a conventional dielectric photonic crystal cavity. Recently, surface-plasmonic nanobeam cavities formed by bonding nanobeam photonic crystal cavities to a silver substrate were proposed [25]. These cavities are ultracompact and are expected to obtain sub-wavelength confinement and thus smaller V values, whereas the reported total Q is still at a value of several hundred (<400).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, because of the optical diffraction limit, further reducing the size of conventional III-V components does not generate the expected advantages [12]. To overcome this limitation, researchers have recently explored metallic III-V nanoscale optical cavities and achieved physical and modal sizes on the subwavelength scale, which is sufficiently small to open up new possibilities for implementing higher-performing Si/III-V hybrid optical systems [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, with this approach, one significant problem in practical integration and use arises: Because of the extremely small output aperture of such a cavity, the radiation from the cavity diverges very rapidly, which makes optical coupling between the III-V cavity and integrated Si-waveguides very inefficient [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the metal comes closer to the cavity, however, ohmic losses also increase. In Chapter 3, I will discuss the tradeoffs between radiation and metal losses in engineering these nanocavities with small V phys [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%