2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13906-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Levels of Fruit Nitrogen as Drivers for the Evolution of Madagascar’s Primate Communities

Abstract: The uneven representation of frugivorous mammals and birds across tropical regions – high in the New World, low in Madagascar and intermediate in Africa and Asia – represents a long-standing enigma in ecology. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain these differences but the ultimate drivers remain unclear. Here, we tested the hypothesis that fruits in Madagascar contain insufficient nitrogen to meet primate metabolic requirements, thus constraining the evolution of frugivory. We performed a global an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(78 reference statements)
3
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Presumably, this and other effects may be weak enough if large amounts of protein in the pulp would result in large amounts of N/S compounds in the scent, which will mask other factors like microbial activity. Alas, protein levels in Malagasy fruits, in this study and in others (Donati et al, ; Ganzhorn et al, ; Valenta & Melin, ), are very low relative to fleshy fruits in other tropical systems. Not surprisingly, the scent of Malagasy fruits also tends to include fewer N/S compounds (Nevo & Valenta, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Presumably, this and other effects may be weak enough if large amounts of protein in the pulp would result in large amounts of N/S compounds in the scent, which will mask other factors like microbial activity. Alas, protein levels in Malagasy fruits, in this study and in others (Donati et al, ; Ganzhorn et al, ; Valenta & Melin, ), are very low relative to fleshy fruits in other tropical systems. Not surprisingly, the scent of Malagasy fruits also tends to include fewer N/S compounds (Nevo & Valenta, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Although such variation was weak for species retention, this was consistent in a global-scale study in which South America showed higher species richness than Madagascar for a given fragment size, and that species richness in Africa has no significant relationship with fragment size [34]. Primates from Madagascar face a limited dietary quality and this could decrease the likelihood of their persistence in small fragments [114]. The non-relationship in Africa is due to the extant taxa being resistant to anthropogenic landscape alterations [34].…”
Section: Effect Of the Neotropical Sub-region On Primate Species Richsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Dietary supplementation is a well‐accepted explanation for primate geophagy (Table S2). While Madagascar's lemurs face unique nutritional challenges (Donati et al., ; Wright, ), geophagy patterns similar to those of other primates persist. Like sifakas, Formosan macaques exhibit no age or sex bias in soil consumption and annually consume soil from numerous sites (Hsu et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is most significant during the austral winter months, when animals in unlogged forest spend up to 26% more time feeding on fruits/seeds than sifakas living in logged forest (Arrigo‐Nelson, ). Given the nutritional differences between fruits, seeds, and leaves ( e.g ., Altmann, Post & Klein, ; Arrigo‐Nelson, , Donati et al., ; Ganzhorn et al., ; National Research Council ), sifaka diets in logged forest likely contain not only fewer sugars and fats, but also fewer plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) from seeds than those in unlogged forest due to the lower proportion of fruits and seeds in their diet. PSMs, such as toxins ( e.g ., alkaloids) and protein inhibitors ( e.g ., tannins), may cause animals physiological harm or inhibit protein intake—costs that must be weighed against the nutritional benefits of a particular food item (Glander, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%