2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-017-0206-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Levels of Allochthony in Consumers Across Three High-Elevation Lake Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Δ 14 C‐zooplankton was un‐related to watershed vegetation cover, but was more depleted in deeper lakes (Table ), suggesting greater allochthonous support of zooplankton in small lakes. This result is consistent with observations of greater t‐OM assimilation by zooplankton in small versus large montane lakes (Vlah et al., 2017), and may reflect the higher ratio of littoral to pelagic habitat in small lakes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Δ 14 C‐zooplankton was un‐related to watershed vegetation cover, but was more depleted in deeper lakes (Table ), suggesting greater allochthonous support of zooplankton in small lakes. This result is consistent with observations of greater t‐OM assimilation by zooplankton in small versus large montane lakes (Vlah et al., 2017), and may reflect the higher ratio of littoral to pelagic habitat in small lakes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While a more exhaustive sampling effort may have revealed a linear or threshold pattern of terrestrial C loading to lakes with elevation (as in Sadro et al., 2011), our limited sampling (12 lakes) instead highlighted the importance of local watershed attributes for controlling the concentration and composition of DOM. Our study spanned a larger elevation gradient (∼2,000 m) than comparable lake surveys in other mountain ranges (Rose et al., 2015 ∼900 m; Vlah et al., 2017 ∼170 m), yet our findings were similar in that DOM concentration and composition were determined by local variation in terrestrial vegetation cover rather than by explicit elevational position.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations