ArticleVitamin D deficiency and insufficiency are extremely prevalent. [1][2][3][4] As measured by 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OH D), deficiency is defined as levels <15 ng/mL (if measured as mmol/L multiply by 2.5). Insufficiency is defined as levels <30 ng/mL. The known and hypothesized clinical consequences of this are significant because vitamin D has important effects on a wide range of physiological processes. It has long been known that inadequate vitamin D status has deleterious clinical effects on bone health. A large and growing body of studies have suggested that vitamin D has additional important effects on numerous other biologic processes, such as cell differentiation and immune system functioning. 2,3 Studies have shown that individuals with higher 25-OH D levels have a significantly lower incidence of many malignancies, autoimmune diseases, and cardiovascular diseases compared with those with less-adequate 25-OH D status.5-9 From a related, but different perspective, intriguing studies have shown that when baseline vitamin D levels are measured in patients with numerous malignancies, including lung, colon and breast, before their oncological treatment begins, those patients with higher 25-OH D levels have improved outcomes compared with patients with the same malignancies but with lower levels of baseline 25-OH D. [10][11][12][13][14] This article describes a protocol that is able to safely normalize low vitamin D levels within 1 to 2 weeks with a high degree of predictability. The use of this protocol will allow the testing of the following hypothesis: if patients with various malignancies have their vitamin D deficiency corrected before formal oncological treatment begins, they will have an improved prognosis compared with patients who remain vitamin D deficient while receiving oncological treatment.Most physicians and labs consider levels of 25-OH D ≥30 ng/mL (75 mmol/L) or higher to be normal, though some recent studies have questioned if normal is as low as 20 ng/mL. Most notable in this latter regard is the highly publicized report from the Institute of Medicine. 15 In the context of the present article, some clarifying comments about this report are in order. The authors of the report from the Institute of Medicine considered that effects of vitamin D, besides the well-known effects on bone health, were not sufficiently proven; therefore, their conclusion that normal levels should be considered to be as low as 20 ng/mL were only relevant for bone health. Suggestive extraskeletal effects of vitamin D were expressly excluded from their report and recommendations. In other words, potential effects of vitamin D status in malignancies, both regarding prevention and potential treatment, as will be discussed in this article, had no place in their report.
AbstractVitamin D status has importance in the prevention and treatment of many malignancies. Patients with breast, colon, and lung malignancies with higher vitamin D status at the onset of treatment have an improved prognosis compared with those p...