2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low level 14C measurements in freshly prepared benzene samples with simultaneous 214Bi/214Po pairs counting for routine 222Rn contamination correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technical details of OSL were described by [68,69]. The C14 dating analyses were carried out at the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Silesian University of Technology (GdS, Gliwice, Poland), using the method described by [70][71][72]. Radiocarbon dating was partially carried out at the Marek Krąpiec Laboratory (MKL, Kraków, Poland).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technical details of OSL were described by [68,69]. The C14 dating analyses were carried out at the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Silesian University of Technology (GdS, Gliwice, Poland), using the method described by [70][71][72]. Radiocarbon dating was partially carried out at the Marek Krąpiec Laboratory (MKL, Kraków, Poland).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geochemical stratigraphy of the core was based on a radiocarbon date set, with eight bulk samples being subjected to dating using the LSC technique according to the standard procedure (Tudyka et al 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiocarbon dating was performed applying a liquid scintillation technique (LSC method) and using alpha/beta spectrometers: Quantulus 1220 and ICELS (Pawlyta et al, 1998;Tudyka and Pazdur, 2010;Tudyka et al, 2015). Calibration of radiocarbon dates was carried out using the computer calibration program OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey et al, 2010) based on the calibration curve IntCal13 (Reimer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%