2012
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Kilovoltage CT of the Neck with 70 kVp: Comparison with a Standard Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 80-kVp neck CT can still be expected to result in a distinct dose reduction. 16 DECT may result in a slower scan speed than certain single-or dual-source CT systems, which may lead to more motion artifacts, which were a potential exclusion criterion in our study. Third, there were far more SCC-related examinations included than the other subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, 80-kVp neck CT can still be expected to result in a distinct dose reduction. 16 DECT may result in a slower scan speed than certain single-or dual-source CT systems, which may lead to more motion artifacts, which were a potential exclusion criterion in our study. Third, there were far more SCC-related examinations included than the other subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] However, only a few prior studies evaluated low-tube-voltage CT acquisitions for imaging the soft-tissue structures of the neck region. [16][17][18] Gnannt et al 16 demonstrated that the consecutive increase in soft-tissue attenuation on 70-kVp scans is higher than the corresponding increase in image noise, therefore resulting in a superior contrastto-noise ratio for neck imaging. They reported a dose reduction of 34% with 70-kVp acquisitions compared with standard 120-kVp acquisitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Automatic exposure control automatically adapts the tube current according to patient attenuation and has demonstrated dose reductions in the region of 20-40% without loss of image quality. 1,6,[10][11][12] However, tube voltage has a larger influence on radiation dose than current, and some studies have indicated that low voltage is useful for facilitating reductions in radiation dose 6,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and quantity of contrast material. 19 Because the patients' sizes and examination sites differ between individual patients, however, it is difficult for a physician to choose the best voltage for any particular patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%