Turbulent Shear Flows 3 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-95410-8_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Frequency Unsteadyness of a Reattaching Turbulent Shear Layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
77
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
15
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the oscillating recirculation bubble, the mean flow speed is one order of magnitude less than the mean main flow speed [26]. The large eddies move downstream and cause local flow reversal, as observed in [3,14,15,19,26]. Durst and Tropea [14] report that in the transitional regime, streamlines are wavy right after the step, and break into "vortex rolls" after 3-4 step heights downstream; as R .…”
Section: Bl Transitional and Turbulent Flow-experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the oscillating recirculation bubble, the mean flow speed is one order of magnitude less than the mean main flow speed [26]. The large eddies move downstream and cause local flow reversal, as observed in [3,14,15,19,26]. Durst and Tropea [14] report that in the transitional regime, streamlines are wavy right after the step, and break into "vortex rolls" after 3-4 step heights downstream; as R .…”
Section: Bl Transitional and Turbulent Flow-experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eaton and Johnson [15] characterize them as "large, turbulent, spanwise eddies" which effect large local flow reversal. These eddies are viewed as three-dimensional, responsible for dissipating structures and coupling together the various recirculation regions [3].…”
Section: Bl Transitional and Turbulent Flow-experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been discussed in detail by Bradshaw and Wong (1972), Eaton and Johnston (1981), and by Cheun, Toy and Moss (1983), to cite but a few. For-this study, since we are not interested in the details of the separation/reattachment process, no attempt was made to modify the upstream flow so as to obtain a prescribed boundary layer state at the step.…”
Section: Onset and Equilibrium Boundary Layersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the backward-facing step, for instance, the dominant frequency was between St ' 0.06 (Le et al 1997) and 0.066 < St < 0.08 (Eaton & Johnston 1982). Aider & Danet (2006) found the flapping frequency as well as the shedding frequency at St = 0.064 and 0.102, respectively.…”
Section: Near-wall Turbulencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Time series of pressure fluctuations are also shown in Figures 9(a,c). The spectra in the saddle plane have a low-frequency peak due to the flapping of the separated shear-layer, typical of the reattachment region of flows with separation, such as backward facing steps (Eaton & Johnston 1982;Driver et al 1987;Dejoan & Leschziner 2004;Aider & Danet 2006); St = 0.011 for the in-phase alignment, 0.021 for the staggered case. The state of the boundary layer approaching the crest may play a role in this di↵erence, in that in the staggered case, the boundary layer approaching the saddle plane is coming from the upstream lobe.…”
Section: Near-wall Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%