1984
DOI: 10.1121/1.2021392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-frequency sound absorption in air

Abstract: An extensive set of sound absorption measurements was taken in air over a range of frequency from 20–2500 Hz, of temperature from 20°–50 °C, and of relative humidity from 0.3%–100%. Over the lower portion of this frequency range, where relaxation in N2 is prominent (except in very dry air), prior measurements are scanty. This study yielded the following conclusions: (1) The humidity dependence of the relaxation frequency of N2 differs in air from that in binary N2-H2O gas mixtures (246-Hz/atm. mole % in air vs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported weather conditions, ambient noise, and other factors can influence the attenuation and detection of bird songs (Harris , Morton , Zuckerwar and Meredith , Larom et al , Catchpole and Slater ). Our results affirm weather conditions (i.e., temperature, wind speed and direction, relative humidity) are important factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported weather conditions, ambient noise, and other factors can influence the attenuation and detection of bird songs (Harris , Morton , Zuckerwar and Meredith , Larom et al , Catchpole and Slater ). Our results affirm weather conditions (i.e., temperature, wind speed and direction, relative humidity) are important factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversion of attenuation coefficients to other units such as dB/m and Np/m is described in a monograph by Knudsen, 29 though their notation is not consistent in the literature. 30 Typical values in air 31 and sea water 32 in standard conditions at low frequencies are given in Table 2. It can be seen that the attenuation induced by numerical damping in the BEM is of the same order of magnitude as attenuation in air in the considered frequency range.…”
Section: Quantification Of Numercial Damping In the Acoustic Bem For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viscous and thermal effects on fluid motion in a pipe of radius r result in an absorption coefficient of (Kinsler, 1982) where η and η e are the true and effective coefficients of shear viscosity, γ is the ratio of specific heats, κ is the thermal conductivity of the fluid, and C p is the specific heat at constant pressure. The absorption coefficient has been studied extensively resulting in models that consider the effects of humidity, temperature, pressure, and other complicating assumptions; see for example Rodarte, et al (2000), Zuckerwar and Meredith (1985), Page and Mee (1984), and Tijdeman (1975). The additional complications were not deemed necessary, as the damping in the cavity will be adjusted at a later date once experimental data is available.…”
Section: Fluid Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%