2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low frequency radio properties of thez > ​5 quasar population

Abstract: Optically luminous quasars at z > 5 are important probes of super-massive black hole (SMBH) formation. With new and future radio facilities, the discovery of the brightest low-frequency radio sources in this epoch would be an important new probe of cosmic reionization through 21-cm absorption experiments. In this work, we systematically study the low-frequency radio properties of a sample of 115 known spectroscopically confirmed z > 5 quasars using the second data release of the Low Frequency Array (LOFA… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radio-loud quasars are relatively rare as they constitute only 8-10% of the quasar population at z 6 (Bañados et al 2015b;Liu et al 2021;Gloudemans et al 2021). To date, there are only five radio-loud quasars known at z > 6: J1427+3312 at z = 6.12 (McGreer et al 2006), J1429+5447 at z = 6.18 (Willott et al 2010), J0309+2717 at z = 6.10 (Belladitta et al 2020), J2318-3113 at z = 6.44 (Ighina et al 2021a), and P172+18 at z = 6.83 (Bañados et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radio-loud quasars are relatively rare as they constitute only 8-10% of the quasar population at z 6 (Bañados et al 2015b;Liu et al 2021;Gloudemans et al 2021). To date, there are only five radio-loud quasars known at z > 6: J1427+3312 at z = 6.12 (McGreer et al 2006), J1429+5447 at z = 6.18 (Willott et al 2010), J0309+2717 at z = 6.10 (Belladitta et al 2020), J2318-3113 at z = 6.44 (Ighina et al 2021a), and P172+18 at z = 6.83 (Bañados et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recalibrated and reimaged the data from this program with the same procedure as described above for the 2017 VLA observations. We also collect the observations from other VLA frequencies and VLBA (Wang et al 2016(Wang et al , 2017, and low-frequency data from LOFAR (Gloudemans et al 2021). These results are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the observed-frame 32 GHz continuum flux density has large uncertainties due to the low S/N (∼3). Quasar J0100+2802 was also detected in the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) Two Meter Sky survey (LoTSS) data release 2 (DR2; Shimwell et al 2022), which was published very recently Gloudemans et al (2021). The LoTSS data were taken in October 2016 at 144 MHz with a pointsource flux density of S 144 MHz = 0.88 ± 0.13 μJy.…”
Section: Comparison With Radio Continuum From Other Epochsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We re-calibrated and re-imaged the data from this program with the same procedure as described above for the 2017 VLA observations. We also collect the observations from other VLA frequencies and VLBA (Wang et al 2016(Wang et al , 2017, and low frequency data from LOFAR (Gloudemans et al 2021). These results are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%