2000
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.107718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low frequency of bacteremia after endoscopic mucosal resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there has been no study on the frequency of bacteremia in patients with LC undergoing ESD. In addition, several studies reported the low rate of bacteremia after EMR or ESD 26,27. Blood culture results were negative in both patients with fever in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, there has been no study on the frequency of bacteremia in patients with LC undergoing ESD. In addition, several studies reported the low rate of bacteremia after EMR or ESD 26,27. Blood culture results were negative in both patients with fever in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, in the present study, we have demonstrated that gastric ESD induced a 2.0% rate of bacteremia, with no clinically manifest infection. The low rate of bacteremia associated with gastric ESD is comparable to the rate associated with conventional EMR for gastric neoplasias [22]. Min et al [23] have also demonstrated that colonic EMR, or even colonic ESD (small numbers of 10 ESD cases) is considered a low-risk procedure for bacteremia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…They are observed in 30%-40% of the cases of infectious endocarditis (39) , but are also responsible for transient bacteremias, i.e., those that do not result in infection. These bacteria are observed after endoscopic procedures such as EGD (5,31,46,51) , esophageal dilation (51) , endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic mucosal resection (23) , EVS (12,40,46,50,52) and EVL (24) . The explanation for bacteremia would be that, as the endoscope moves along the oropharynx it can injure the mucosa, thus favoring bacteremia (12,46) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%