SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015 2015
DOI: 10.1190/segam2015-5843272.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low frequency models for seismic inversions: strategies for success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This low frequency model assures the inversion is consistent with the background geological information by including sub-seismic frequencies in the Bnal computation. This stabilizes the inversion workCow by introducing temporal limits and spatial variations to the interpreted seismic horizons (Dutta and Khazanehdari 2006;Pendrel 2015;Azevedo and Soares 2017). Due to the non-uniqueness of seismic inversion, higherthan and lower-than-real seismic frequencies will appear in the inverted data.…”
Section: Model-based Seismic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This low frequency model assures the inversion is consistent with the background geological information by including sub-seismic frequencies in the Bnal computation. This stabilizes the inversion workCow by introducing temporal limits and spatial variations to the interpreted seismic horizons (Dutta and Khazanehdari 2006;Pendrel 2015;Azevedo and Soares 2017). Due to the non-uniqueness of seismic inversion, higherthan and lower-than-real seismic frequencies will appear in the inverted data.…”
Section: Model-based Seismic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is worth stressing that band-limited seismic data do not contain the original low frequency spectrum of the acquired signal, as it is Bltered out ('cut-oA') during processing (Ray and Chopra 2015;Azevedo and Soares 2017). Without this lower frequency content, the quantitative prediction of reservoir properties is somewhat inaccurate and non-unique (Pendrel 2015;Sams and Carter 2017).…”
Section: Inversion Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prior impedances of Ip and Is incorporate the background knowledge of the subsurface into the inversion results by employing well data information in a stratigraphic grid (Doyen, 2007;de Figueiredo et al, 2017). The interpolation of well logs between well locations behaves as LFMs of filtered elastic properties that highly impact the differentiation of litho-facies on inverted elastic properties (Bosch et al, 2009;Kumar and Negi 2012;Pendrel, 2015). Also, the prior impedances are taken as fundamental models in the stochastic inversion procedure for compensating the missing low frequencies (about 6/10 Hz) and used to evaluate the fitting degree between modeled and observed elastic properties in the likelihood function (Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Bayesian Stochastic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the quality of the available seismic velocity is doubtful and it does not conform to the geological structure. Thus, a simple shale compaction trend workflow was selected with iterative inversion and update of the low frequency information through simultaneous inversion and Bayesian facies estimation procedure (Pendrel, 2015).…”
Section: Seismic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%