2007
DOI: 10.1159/000111749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Fluoride Dentifrice and Caries Lesion Control in Children with Different Caries Experience: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: Since there is no consensus on the anticaries effectiveness of low-fluoride (F) dentifrice, this randomized clinical trial evaluated its effect in children at different caries activity status. One hundred and twenty 2- to 4-year-old children, half with and half without active caries lesions, were randomly divided into 2 groups which used 500- or 1,100-µg F/g (NaF) dentifrices during 1 year. Caries progression or regression were evaluated as the number of lesions becoming active/cavities or inactive, respective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(8 reference statements)
4
42
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent report of a trial in Brazil made the interesting comment that "The anticaries effect of the low-F dentrifice [500 ppm] was similar to the conventional F dentrifice [1100 ppm] when used by caries-inactive children. However, in children with active caries lesions the low-F dentrifice was less effective than the 1100-µgF/g dentrifice in controlling the progression of lesions" (30). This rather reinforces evidence from Australia that there is little penalty of a rise in caries experience, or reduced caries prevention, in recommending use of 500 ppm toothpastes rather than 1000 ppm toothpastes for use by young children (31).…”
Section: Recommendations Regarding the Use Of Fluoride-containing Toomentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A recent report of a trial in Brazil made the interesting comment that "The anticaries effect of the low-F dentrifice [500 ppm] was similar to the conventional F dentrifice [1100 ppm] when used by caries-inactive children. However, in children with active caries lesions the low-F dentrifice was less effective than the 1100-µgF/g dentrifice in controlling the progression of lesions" (30). This rather reinforces evidence from Australia that there is little penalty of a rise in caries experience, or reduced caries prevention, in recommending use of 500 ppm toothpastes rather than 1000 ppm toothpastes for use by young children (31).…”
Section: Recommendations Regarding the Use Of Fluoride-containing Toomentioning
confidence: 80%
“…250 ppm F) were clearly not as effective as the conventional toothpastes to control caries. A clinical study published in 2008 30 brought some light to this subject, by demonstrating that low fluoride and conventional toothpastes were equally effective to control caries in caries-inactive children, but low fluoride toothpastes used by caries-active children resulted in an increased number of incipient lesions after one year, while the conventional one could control the appearance of new lesions. This was further explained by a recent study 31 showing that low F toothpastes are not able to control caries under a high cariogenic challenge (biofilm accumulation and exposure to sucrose 8 times/ day).…”
Section: Individual Methods Of Fluoride Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these results provide scientific evidence to corroborate the efficacy of dentifrices having high concentration, because a dentifrice must have at least 1000 ppm of fluoride in soluble form in order to have an anticarie effect 18 . Concentrations less than 1000 ppm F are not capable of inhibiting the development of caries in highly challenging cariogenic situations 19 or in the presence of active caries 20 . These processes are constantly active mainly in children with increased risk of caries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%