1992
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970120615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low fluorescence alpha satellite region yields negative result

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, clustering of acrocentric chromosomes around the nucleolus organizer region may obscure the resolution of centromeric probes in interphase nuclei (Klinger et aZ., 1992). In addition, variations in alphoid DNA sequences have led to false results with this probe (Mizunoe and Young, 1992;Verma and Luke, 1992). In contrast to Lebo et al (1992), we conclude that the use of ths probe is unreliable for analysing chromosome 21 or 13 copy number in uncultured amniocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, clustering of acrocentric chromosomes around the nucleolus organizer region may obscure the resolution of centromeric probes in interphase nuclei (Klinger et aZ., 1992). In addition, variations in alphoid DNA sequences have led to false results with this probe (Mizunoe and Young, 1992;Verma and Luke, 1992). In contrast to Lebo et al (1992), we conclude that the use of ths probe is unreliable for analysing chromosome 21 or 13 copy number in uncultured amniocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, a limitation of this probe-type is that the copy number of the repeat sequence detected by the probe is highly variable and may be too small to produce any signal which may lead to false negative or false positive FISH results (Mizunoe and Young, 1992;Verma and Luke, 1992;Cacheux et al, 1994;Verlinsky et al, 1995;Catala Á et al, 1996). When using this probe-type for follow-up studies in uncultured AF cells, false results can often be prevented by ®rst testing the probe on cells with the chromosome aberration that needs to be veri®ed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe the discrepancy is likely to be due to the lower sensitivity of the other investigator's methods, which were generally based on interphase and metaphase FISH using conventional fluorescence microscope detection. Furthermore, unlike our study, which has compared all of the human chromosomes, previous investigators have analyzed only one or two chromosomes (Wevrick et al 1990;Mizunoe and Young 1992;Verma and Luke 1992;Weier and Gray 1992;Bossuyt et al 1995;Abruzzo et al 1996;Verma et al 1997;Liehr et al 1998;Verma et al 1998) and therefore do not provide a relative measure of low-alphoid centromeres among the different chromosomes.…”
Section: Wwwgenomeorgmentioning
confidence: 93%