2022
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low fetal age is not a contraindication for extracorporeal membranous oxygenation in COVID‐19‐related ARDS

Abstract: Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) causes a small proportion of patients to be admitted to intensive care units, where they sometimes require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The literature on pregnant women with COVID‐19 who require ECMO is sparse. Case report We describe here the earliest‐fetal‐age pregnant patient with COVID‐19 who underwent ECMO yet reported, who kept her child while under close follow‐up with magnetic resonance imagery and ultrasound. Conclusion The management… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 312 articles through the initial database search and the subsequent manual search. After removing 207 items based on the title and abstract, we reviewed the full text of 105 articles and included 44 studies (total number of ECMO use = 110) in the systematic review (8, 9, 11–14, 19–56). In particular, three studies with relatively large sample sizes (number of ECMO use = 42, 31, and 69) were excluded because they did not provide clinical data of patients on ECMO separately (57–59).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We identified 312 articles through the initial database search and the subsequent manual search. After removing 207 items based on the title and abstract, we reviewed the full text of 105 articles and included 44 studies (total number of ECMO use = 110) in the systematic review (8, 9, 11–14, 19–56). In particular, three studies with relatively large sample sizes (number of ECMO use = 42, 31, and 69) were excluded because they did not provide clinical data of patients on ECMO separately (57–59).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, three studies with relatively large sample sizes (number of ECMO use = 42, 31, and 69) were excluded because they did not provide clinical data of patients on ECMO separately (57–59). Of the 44 articles, 18 were retrospective observational studies (8, 9, 14, 19–33), four were case series (11–13, 34), and 22 were case reports (35–56). Among the total of 22 observational studies and case series, 10 studies included only one ECMO patient (12, 14, 27–34).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations