2020
DOI: 10.1111/apa.15661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low false‐positive rate of perfusion index as a screening tool for neonatal aortic coarctation

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, combined POS and PI increased sensitivity for detection of systemic critical outflow obstruction to 80% (from 20% with POS alone) [ 24 ]. However, there remains a lack of consensus on determining the appropriate cut-off values, and false positive rates are high, although repeat PI measurements with screening at > 12 h may help lower these [ 40 ]. Thus, further evaluation of screening protocols in larger trials is required to ascertain the potential clinical impact before its adoption in the routine clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, combined POS and PI increased sensitivity for detection of systemic critical outflow obstruction to 80% (from 20% with POS alone) [ 24 ]. However, there remains a lack of consensus on determining the appropriate cut-off values, and false positive rates are high, although repeat PI measurements with screening at > 12 h may help lower these [ 40 ]. Thus, further evaluation of screening protocols in larger trials is required to ascertain the potential clinical impact before its adoption in the routine clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Un parámetro que los autores consideran de utilidad clínica para ser tomado en cuenta, de forma adjunta a la OP durante la realización del TNC es el IP, mismo que a pesar de su potencial importancia, ha sido hasta el momento infraestimado, probablemente por las observaciones existentes de su alta variabilidad en un corto periodo de tiempo, llevando a resultados falsos positivos, problema que podría ser subsanado con la realización de mediciones repetidas. 105,106 Se trata de la estimación indirecta y no invasiva de la perfusión periférica (indicativo de la fuerza de la señal del pulso arterial), a través de la fuerza pulsátil de un sitio corporal específico de estudio, como una mano o un dedo, por ejemplo, calculada mediante la relación del componente corriente alterna y corriente continua de la fotopletismografía. 46,53 De acuerdo con el estudio de Wren y colaboradores en Reino Unido, alrededor de 30% de pacientes con CCC fueron diagnosticados posterior al alta hospitalaria.…”
Section: íNdice De Perfusiónunclassified
“…108 Cabe mencionar que el diagnóstico tardío de la coartación aórtica (prevalencia reportada en alrededor de 4/10,000 RN vivos) 109 y de otras alteraciones obstructivas izquierdas, siguen representando un problema por las implicaciones en aspectos de morbimortalidad de quienes las padecen. 106 En 2018, Uygur, en Taiwán, dio a conocer su estudio prospectivo en 3,175 RN. Se midió la OP, el IP y se realizó un examen físico dirigido.…”
Section: íNdice De Perfusiónunclassified
“…10,11 In their study, published in this edition of Acta Paediatrica, Lannering et al have investigated the effect of introducing repeated measurements of abnormal results (similar to the repeated measurements recommended for pulse oximetry screening) to reduce the false-positive rate in PI screening. 12 They recorded pre-and post-ductal PI in a total of 513 apparently healthy term newborns at the same time as oxygen saturations were measured as part of POS (median age 18 h). This included an initial pilot of 50 babies with up to 3 immediate repeats if PI was below the pre-determined cut-off of 0.7.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, published in this edition of Acta Paediatrica , Lannering et al have investigated the effect of introducing repeated measurements of abnormal results (similar to the repeated measurements recommended for pulse oximetry screening) to reduce the false‐positive rate in PI screening 12 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%