2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy X-ray performance of SOI pixel sensors for astronomy, “XRPIX”

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ∆E, E, F , W , σ inde , and σ gain represent the energy resolution, X-ray/γ-ray energy, Fano factor (0.12), mean ionization energy per electron-hole pair in Si (3.65 eV), energy-independent noise in rms, and pixel-to-pixel relative gain variation in rms, respectively. 19 As expressed in Eq. 2, the Fano noise, energy-independent components (e.g., readout noise), and energy-dependent pixel-by-pixel pedestal nonuniformity contribute to the energy resolution.…”
Section: Energy Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ∆E, E, F , W , σ inde , and σ gain represent the energy resolution, X-ray/γ-ray energy, Fano factor (0.12), mean ionization energy per electron-hole pair in Si (3.65 eV), energy-independent noise in rms, and pixel-to-pixel relative gain variation in rms, respectively. 19 As expressed in Eq. 2, the Fano noise, energy-independent components (e.g., readout noise), and energy-dependent pixel-by-pixel pedestal nonuniformity contribute to the energy resolution.…”
Section: Energy Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%