2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.65.205101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy states with different symmetries in thetJmodel with two holes on a 32-site lattice

Abstract: We study the low-energy states of the t-J model with two holes on a 32-site lattice with periodic boundary conditions. In contrary to common belief, we find that the state with d x 2 Ϫy 2 symmetry is not always the ground state in the realistic parameter range 0.2рJ/tр0.4. There exist low-lying finite-momentum p states whose energies are lower than the d x 2 Ϫy 2 state when J/t is small enough. We compare various properties of these low-energy states at J/tϭ0.3 where they are almost degenerate and find that th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extrapolation from finite size clusters to the infinite lattice, however, suggests that the pair state is no longer the ground state at J /t = 0.3, but an excited state with an energy of approximately 0.17t [143]. The inclusion of longer range interactions and hopping in the t-J model increases the energy of the pair state further and confirms the conclusion that for parameter values relevant to cuprates the ground state of the cluster has two unbound holes in the nodal states [144]. Extending the calculations to the 32-site clusters with 4 holes, which corresponds to a doping of 1/8, shows all four holes entering into nodal states with no signs of pairing correlations [145].…”
Section: Do Cooperons Play a Role In The Cuprates?supporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An extrapolation from finite size clusters to the infinite lattice, however, suggests that the pair state is no longer the ground state at J /t = 0.3, but an excited state with an energy of approximately 0.17t [143]. The inclusion of longer range interactions and hopping in the t-J model increases the energy of the pair state further and confirms the conclusion that for parameter values relevant to cuprates the ground state of the cluster has two unbound holes in the nodal states [144]. Extending the calculations to the 32-site clusters with 4 holes, which corresponds to a doping of 1/8, shows all four holes entering into nodal states with no signs of pairing correlations [145].…”
Section: Do Cooperons Play a Role In The Cuprates?supporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, at present there is no information on this question to the best of our knowledge. Leung and collaborators [143][144][145] concluded from these calculations that at low densities holes entered the nodal regions, consistent with nodal Fermi pockets. The low energy d-wave pair excited state is interpreted as a finite energy cooperon in the strong coupling t-J model and its extensions.…”
Section: Do Cooperons Play a Role In The Cuprates?mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, at low doping a strong pairing mechanism of holes into molecular pairs, which would be required deep in a BEC regime, remains elusive. Theoretically it has become clear that pairing is possible at low doping in the t − J model [206,134,200,21], but it is not very robust to parameter changes. Recently broad numerical analysis by the Simons Collaboration has produced mounting evidence that the clean 2D Hubbard model may not support a superconducting ground state in the relevant regime, although the addition of next-nearest neighbor hopping terms t may support it [161].…”
Section: New Directions: Mixed-dimensional Bilayer Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the magnetic degree of freedom favours the pairing of holes, the bound state is frustrated due to Pauli blocking causing a kinetic energy cost for two holes at close distance. This intricate interplay of magnetic and kinetic energy not only complicates theoretical investigations but also also leads to small binding energies [25,26] rendering pairing challenging to observe at temperatures of state-of-the-art quantum simulators [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%