2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(03)00518-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy ion-beam induced effects in Al(1 0 0) surface studied using Rutherford backscattering and channeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For channeling measurements the sample was aligned with the ion beam incident along the ½0 0 1 direction by minimizing the backscattered ion yield in a small region behind the surface peak. Low-energy ion scattering and high-energy ion channeling measurements were made in separate experiments because of the tendency for He + ions implanted during LEIS to interfere with the channeling of high-energy He + ions [29]. A total dose of 3 · 10 14 ions/cm 2 was used to collect each channeling spectrum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For channeling measurements the sample was aligned with the ion beam incident along the ½0 0 1 direction by minimizing the backscattered ion yield in a small region behind the surface peak. Low-energy ion scattering and high-energy ion channeling measurements were made in separate experiments because of the tendency for He + ions implanted during LEIS to interfere with the channeling of high-energy He + ions [29]. A total dose of 3 · 10 14 ions/cm 2 was used to collect each channeling spectrum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the Al surface peak area for channeled MeV He ions, as well as the dechanneling yield from well below the surface, indicated an unusual increase in the depth distribution of the backscattered ion yield from Al with increasing low-energy He ion dose (Ramana et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable amount of data can be found in literature related to studies on charge fractions after collisions of atomic projectiles with solid targets. Early work on this problem was concentrated on the analysis of charge state distributions after the transmission of fast ions through thin solid foils or through targets with atoms in the gas phase over a wide domain of projectile velocities (Garnir et al, 1996;Grande & Schiwietz, 1998;Perumal, 2005), whereas such data for scattering experiments from surfaces of solid targets are rather rare Ramana et al, 2003;Yang and Jory, 2003;Nakajima et al, 2004). In recent years, however, the impact of atomic projectiles on the surface of solid targets has been paid increased attention, and measurements of charge fractions for energetic projectiles provided the basis for a microscopic understanding of the atom-surface interaction scenario (Kimura et al, 1992;Winter et al, 1998, Wethekam et al, 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%