2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(02)00265-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy impact effects on candidate automotive structural composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There is strong evidence from these specimens in Figures 11a -11e that a combination of matrix cracking, delamination and fibre breakage are the predominant failure modes. These failure mechanisms agree very well with the impact damages reported by (Corum et al 2003;Rio et al 2005) for chopped glass fibre composites and Carbon fibre reinforced Epoxy matrix composites.…”
Section: Failure Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There is strong evidence from these specimens in Figures 11a -11e that a combination of matrix cracking, delamination and fibre breakage are the predominant failure modes. These failure mechanisms agree very well with the impact damages reported by (Corum et al 2003;Rio et al 2005) for chopped glass fibre composites and Carbon fibre reinforced Epoxy matrix composites.…”
Section: Failure Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Such technologies are also promising in terms of production costs, as they allow to manufacture large parts in single moulding operations and to pay back the initial costs even for low/medium production volumes (10,000÷100,000 parts) [1,2,4,5]. Moving from the previous considerations, some authors point out that raw material cost is the major limit for the diffusion of composite in automotive mass production [4,5], though other drawbacks are often mentioned such as the aesthetic requirements relevant to high quality surface finish for external parts or the need to increase the amount of recycling materials [5,6]. Moreover, composites tend to develop damage during manufacturing and handling as well as delamination due to impacts with foreign objects or debris [5,6], which may lead to severe reduction of strength properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving from the previous considerations, some authors point out that raw material cost is the major limit for the diffusion of composite in automotive mass production [4,5], though other drawbacks are often mentioned such as the aesthetic requirements relevant to high quality surface finish for external parts or the need to increase the amount of recycling materials [5,6]. Moreover, composites tend to develop damage during manufacturing and handling as well as delamination due to impacts with foreign objects or debris [5,6], which may lead to severe reduction of strength properties. These limitations are a major concern in high performance composite laminates but also affect composite material systems specifically suited for mass production technologies [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sung et al [15] have found that the acoustic emission waves, generated by a low-velocity impact loading, do not allow them to distinguish the damage modes and their size. Corum et al [16] determined the damaged area of impacted specimen by ultrasonic C-scans. Furthermore, the damage characteristics of the perpendicular cross-section of the impacted laminates can be observed using destructive methods [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%