2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03475.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy electron scattering in carbon-based materials analyzed by scanning transmission electron microscopy and its application to sample thickness determination

Abstract: Key words. Carbon-based materials, low electron energy, Monte Carlo simulations, quantitative analysis, sample thickness determination, scanning transmission electron microscopy. SummaryHigh-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF STEM) at low energies (≤30 keV) was used to study quantitatively electron scattering in amorphous carbon and carbon-based materials. Experimental HAADF STEM intensities from samples with well-known composition and thickness are compared with results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy could be related to the fact that the material properties of DNA were taken for the MC simulations which is somewhat denser that the cytosol. Moreover, the applied Mott cross‐sections may not be well suited to describe low‐energy electron scattering in low‐ Z materials which was previously observed in context with scanning transmission electron microscopy studies of carbon‐containing materials at electron energies below 20 keV (Pfaff et al ., ). We note that screened Rutherford cross‑sections do not yield better results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The discrepancy could be related to the fact that the material properties of DNA were taken for the MC simulations which is somewhat denser that the cytosol. Moreover, the applied Mott cross‐sections may not be well suited to describe low‐energy electron scattering in low‐ Z materials which was previously observed in context with scanning transmission electron microscopy studies of carbon‐containing materials at electron energies below 20 keV (Pfaff et al ., ). We note that screened Rutherford cross‑sections do not yield better results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…EM offers the possibility to measure the sample thickness via the quantification of electron scattering (31,32). To reveal the relationship between thickness and measured signal, the scattering process toward the sample material of known density and composition is simulated by a Monte Carlo software tool (33)(34)(35) that was introduced by Reichelt and Engel (36), and extended by Krzyzánek and Reichelt (37).…”
Section: Thickness Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the time being, it is important to point out that the contrast in HAADF STEM images is also sensitive to the thickness of the TEM sample. 38 It is possible that the spin-coated IMs can be partially dissolved by chlorobenzene during film formation process of the FHBC:PCBM layer. These IMs can re-aggregate and cause variation of the local thickness of the FHBC:PCBM layer, inducing local thickness variations resulting in bright and dark patches.…”
Section: Thin Film Characterization Of Fhbc:pcbm Blend Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%