2007
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2007-00032-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy electron scattering from gaseous CS2: angular distributions and effect of exchange forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our Q e agrees well with the previous result of Sohn et al 27 below 5 eV, but no other experimental data are available for comparison from 8 to 200 eV. Six theoretical approaches are available for comparison, those of Lynch et al, 31 Lee et al, 41 Bettega et al, 42,43 Gianturco and Stoecklin, 44 and Raj and Tomar, 30 as well as the present IAM-SCAR calculation. The calculation of Raj and Tomar 30 (only above 100 eV) considerably overestimates the experimental measurement.…”
Section: Anglesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our Q e agrees well with the previous result of Sohn et al 27 below 5 eV, but no other experimental data are available for comparison from 8 to 200 eV. Six theoretical approaches are available for comparison, those of Lynch et al, 31 Lee et al, 41 Bettega et al, 42,43 Gianturco and Stoecklin, 44 and Raj and Tomar, 30 as well as the present IAM-SCAR calculation. The calculation of Raj and Tomar 30 (only above 100 eV) considerably overestimates the experimental measurement.…”
Section: Anglesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Figure 4 shows the overall behavior of the elastic differential cross sections for CS 2 at energies between 1.5 and 200 eV. The present calculated results (IAM-SCAR and CMS) are also presented and compared, as are the Schwinger variational calculations of Lee et al, 41 the SMC results of Bettega et al, 42,43 the results from the calculation of Gianturco and Stoecklin 44 and the IAM calculations of Raj and Tomar. 30 We also compare with the other available experimental results, those of Sohn et al 27 and Allan.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this study, a complex optical potential is used to represent the electron-molecule interaction, whereas a combination of the ISVM [17] and the DWA [18,19] is used to solve the [11]; full circles, experimental data of Sohn et al [1]; asterisks, measured data of Kitajima, as quoted in Ref. [11].…”
Section: Theory and Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bettega et al [9,10] used the Schwinger multichannel method with pseudopotentials to calculate elastic cross sections for energies up to 50 eV at the static-exchange [9] and static-exchange plus polarization [10] levels of approximation. Very recently, elastic DCSs, ICSs, and momentum-transfer cross sections (MTCSs) were calculated by Gianturco and Stoecklin [11] for energies ranging from near zero up to 100 eV. Nevertheless, for energies above 100 eV there are no DCS calculations beyond the IAM approximation in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation