2001
DOI: 10.1002/app.2166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐energy electron beam‐induced cationic polymerization with onium salts

Abstract: Demand for higher polymer performance with very short cure times has resulted in the development of low energy electron beam processes. This article presents the results of such a process for curing two epoxy systems, namely 3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3Ј,4Ј-epoxycyclohexane carboxylate and di-glycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA), using the cationic photoinitiator salts, triarylsulfonium hexafluoroantimonate, and diaryliodonium hexafluoroantimonate, respectively. Glass transition temperature measurements were d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, thermally cured epoxy systems invariably suffer from relatively long cure times and, for high‐temperature systems, an unacceptably high curing temperature may actually damage the components and devices, which are expected to be protected. Attempts to cure epoxy systems, formulated with photoinitiators, by UV or e‐beam radiation3–8 have shown several advantages over the thermal process, with the most important being the reduction by at least an order of magnitude in cure time, as well as the minimization of residual stress. This paper reports on the use of a low‐energy e‐beam radiation process to cure the epoxy system SU8 and, subsequent characterization of the degree of conversion by using Fourier‐transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, thermally cured epoxy systems invariably suffer from relatively long cure times and, for high‐temperature systems, an unacceptably high curing temperature may actually damage the components and devices, which are expected to be protected. Attempts to cure epoxy systems, formulated with photoinitiators, by UV or e‐beam radiation3–8 have shown several advantages over the thermal process, with the most important being the reduction by at least an order of magnitude in cure time, as well as the minimization of residual stress. This paper reports on the use of a low‐energy e‐beam radiation process to cure the epoxy system SU8 and, subsequent characterization of the degree of conversion by using Fourier‐transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both, the direct activation of epoxy groups as well as the dissociation of the sulfonium salt contribute to a cross linking of SU8 exposed to electron irradiation. The resulting polymer differs from its UVA-crosslinked counterpart in several material properties such as the glass transition temperature and the level of mechanical stress [34,35]. The latter combined with the observations that SU8-LIPSS is highly susceptible to both, bending of the wafer substrate as well as touching with an AFM tip, led to the conclusion that mechanical stress is the key factor for the deletion of the periodic pattern.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photochemically induced cationic polymerization has been shown to be applicable to the high functionality epoxy-based negative photoresist material -SU8, which has been widely used in photolithographic fabrication of micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) [19,20].…”
Section: Results Obtained and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%