2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.89.044613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low energy deuteron-induced reactions on Fe isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
134
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
10
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreasing trend for deuteron energies greater than 5 MeV on 54,56 Fe isotopes has also been shown in the theoretical estimations of Ref. [11] while for 58 Fe they indicated an increasing trend up to about 9 MeV of the deuteron energy. The reason for the discrepancy is not clear at the moment.…”
Section: IV Cross Sections and Angular Distributionssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decreasing trend for deuteron energies greater than 5 MeV on 54,56 Fe isotopes has also been shown in the theoretical estimations of Ref. [11] while for 58 Fe they indicated an increasing trend up to about 9 MeV of the deuteron energy. The reason for the discrepancy is not clear at the moment.…”
Section: IV Cross Sections and Angular Distributionssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Recent studies [10,11] have shown that measured differential elastic scattering cross sections of deuterons on medium-mass nuclei were not reproduced by theoretical calculations, especially at backward angles and for bombarding energies below 20 MeV. Using our elastic scatter-ing data, we examined known optical model parameters for deuteron energies below 10 MeV.…”
Section: III Elastic Scattering Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [28], the same authors compare their breakup fraction estimates for the proton channel alone (but including elastic breakup) with the preliminary results from this project [13], where the breakup cross section that is lost in the present estimates due to the forward-angle dip was not subtracted. If that cross section is added to the present estimates for all channels, the points in the lower panel of Fig.…”
Section: Importance Of Projectile Breakup a Current Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Avrigeanu et al (2014) performed cross-section measurements by irradiating thin foils of natural iron using the stacked foil technique with a 19.74 MeV deuteron beam and found that the 54 Fe(d,n) 55 Co excitation function reaches a maximum of ~ 158 mb at 6.71 MeV. The predicted thick target production yield from this excitation function integrated over the energy on the impinging particles available from a GE PETtrace cyclotron, 8.2 MeV, as they are slowed down in the target material is 23.2 MBq/μA h. Likewise, from the 58 Ni(p,α) excitation functions that were measured by Khandaker et al (2011) we can predict a thick target yield with our 16 MeV proton beam of 15.6 MBq/μAh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%