2016
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3018(16)30010-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dose versus standard-dose ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in virologically suppressed Thai adults with HIV (LASA): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ART optimization through dose reduction of individual drugs can improve the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of ART regimens, lower their manufacturing costs, and help to achieve these goals [23,42]. It has been evaluated in several phase I-IV clinical trials with varying degrees of success [43][44][45]. The biggest success of dose reduction studies has been in the case of EFV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ART optimization through dose reduction of individual drugs can improve the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of ART regimens, lower their manufacturing costs, and help to achieve these goals [23,42]. It has been evaluated in several phase I-IV clinical trials with varying degrees of success [43][44][45]. The biggest success of dose reduction studies has been in the case of EFV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreasing ARV intake is not necessarily itself. Recent clinical trials have shown that certain selected ART regimens can be effective with a weekends-off schedule and entail less severe side effects [35], or that switching to a lower dose of Atazanavir was effective with less toxicity than the standard dose among Thai PLWHIV with mean bodyweight of 59 kg which is closer to women’s bodyweight [36]. In addition, it has been long advocated that health-related quality of life be considered in addition to efficacy when choosing between the many possible combinations of antiretroviral therapies [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV-1-infected participants aged ≥18 years old with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml and currently using ATV, either 200 or 300 mg, with Norvir  SGC (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL, USA) 100 mg once daily plus two NRTI backbones were enrolled from HIV-NAT, The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand, and Chonburi Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand, into this prospective, open-label, 48-week single-arm study. Participants using ARV 200 mg were the participants who were previously enrolled in the low-dose versus standard-dose RTV-boosted ATV in virologically suppressed Thai adults with HIV (LASA) study conducted in HIV-NAT [5]. A subset of 16 participants using ATV 200 mg underwent intensive PK analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atazanavir (ATV) is preferred over lopinavir due to lower pill burden, better lipid profile and less gastrointestinal disturbance [3]. Boosted low-dose ATV of 200 mg showed adequate pharmacokinetic (PK) levels, great efficacy and safety for an HIV-1-infected Thai population [4][5][6][7]. The therapeutic level of ATV is between 0.15 and 0.85 mg/l [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%