“…Some have already been successfully debunked based on reproducible, high-quality studies, such as the fallacy of static versus cidal antibiotics [ 139 ], combination therapy or double coverage in the treatment of Pseudomonas and/or sepsis [ 140–144 ], the recommendation for continuation of antibiotics for neutropenic fever until the resolution of neutropenia [ 82 , 145 ], the use of aminoglycoside or rifampin for synergistic treatment in staphylococcal endocarditis or sepsis [ 142 , 146–148 ], the inability to shorten antimicrobial therapy in patients with immune dysfunction [ 11 ], and the need for routine antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated diverticulitis [ 149 ]. Other long-standing dogmas are now being rightfully questioned, with studies poised to commence that may well overturn them, such as high-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for pneumocystis pneumonia [ 100 ], the preference of pyrimethamine-containing regimens over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of toxoplasma encephalitis [ 150 ], the advantage of antistaphylococcal penicillin over cefazolin for the treatment of S aureus bacteremia [ 151 ], the routine fundoscopic examination in candidemia [ 152 ], and additional anaerobic coverage for aspiration pneumonia [ 153 ].…”