2015
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-13-00221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Dose Radiation Risks of Computerized Tomography and Cone Beam Computerized Tomography: Reducing the Fear and Controversy

Abstract: Regulations for protecting humans against stochastic biological effects from ionizing radiation are based on the linear no-threshold (LNT) risk assessment model, which states that any amount of radiation exposure may lead to cancer in a population. Based on the LNT model, risk from low-dose radiation increases linearly with increasing doses of radiation. Imaging procedures in medicine and dentistry are an important source of low-dose ionizing radiation. The increased use of computerized tomography (CT) and con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
14
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this study was limited by its small sample size ( N = 108) and they were from only one Veterans Administration Medical Center. There is a dearth of information on the attitudes and beliefs of smokers related to lung cancer screening . Identifying all barriers and facilitators for smokers is essential for promoting lung cancer screening for a high‐risk population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study was limited by its small sample size ( N = 108) and they were from only one Veterans Administration Medical Center. There is a dearth of information on the attitudes and beliefs of smokers related to lung cancer screening . Identifying all barriers and facilitators for smokers is essential for promoting lung cancer screening for a high‐risk population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stochastic effect is governed by the laws of probability; therefore, it may or may not occur, and a threshold does not exist. The low levels of ionizing radiation induced by CBCT do have the potential to cause stochastic effects and, thus, are a potential risk factor for carcinogenesis [20]. …”
Section: Long-term Cancer Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although E is mainly used in radiation protection, it has found large application in comparing exposure risk of only certain body regions, such as the maxillofacial region. The risk associated with CBCT imaging has mainly been compared to the radiation dose imparted by a standard panoramic radiographic procedure [20]. The E of a digital panoramic radiograph ranges from 0.004 to 0.030 mSv, whereas, depending on CBCT devices, published E levels vary from 0.027 to 1.073 mSv, an equivalent of 2–10 panoramic radiographs [2, 20].…”
Section: Long-term Cancer Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 Düşük mA ve radyasyon dozu, diğer Bilgisayarlı Tomografi görüntüleme metotları ile maruz kalınandan önemli ölçüde düşük-tür. 13,14 Ayrıca en az distorsiyonla maksillofasiyal iskeletsel yapıların yüksek çözünürlükte görüntülerini sağlamadaki yeteneği, bu teknolojinin tercih sebebi yapmaktadır. 15 Tüm bu avantajlarına rağmen, KIBT ile alınan radyasyon miktarının yüksekliği akıldan çıkarıl-mamalı ve yalnızca kapsamlı inceleme sonucu teşhiste zorlanılan vakalarda kullanılmasının faydalı olacağı unutulmamalıdır.…”
unclassified