2018
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dose ionizing radiation increases the mortality risk of solid cancers in nuclear industry workers: A meta-analysis

Abstract: Abstract. Low-dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) may increase the mortality of solid cancers in nuclear industry workers, but only few individual cohort studies exist, and the available reports have low statistical power. The aim of the present study was to focus on solid cancer mortality risk from LDIR in the nuclear industry using standard mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals. A systematic literature search through the PubMed and Embase databases identified 27 studies relevant to this meta-analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies indicate that nuclear workers have an increased risk of brain cancer (e.g., Alexander 1991 ; Qu et al 2018 ; Schubauer-Berigan et al 2005 )) although not all studies show this ( Boice et al 2006 ; Dupree-Ellis et al 2000 ; Hunter et al 2013 ; Kreuzer et al 2015 ; Loomis & Wolf 1996 ; Lopez-Abente et al 2001 ). It is unlikely that the size of the nuclear work force would be sufficient to substantially raise brain cancer incidence rates at the state level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies indicate that nuclear workers have an increased risk of brain cancer (e.g., Alexander 1991 ; Qu et al 2018 ; Schubauer-Berigan et al 2005 )) although not all studies show this ( Boice et al 2006 ; Dupree-Ellis et al 2000 ; Hunter et al 2013 ; Kreuzer et al 2015 ; Loomis & Wolf 1996 ; Lopez-Abente et al 2001 ). It is unlikely that the size of the nuclear work force would be sufficient to substantially raise brain cancer incidence rates at the state level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its most significant target is to explore the longer term impacts of bomb-derived radiation on reasons for death and the occurrence of malignancy. The examination has indicated that the danger of solid malignancy and leukemia among atomic specialists is steady with the dosage assessed, even if they get the radiation at low dose rates over numerous years [ 58 ]. The global INWORKS study has shown that in any event, when the combined dose of atomic industry laborers was under 100 mSv and the dose rate was under 10 mGy every year, the danger of solid malignancy is steady based on the dosage assessment [ 59 ].…”
Section: Biological Effects In Nuclear and Radiological Accidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1948-1953 1954-1963 1964-1973 1974-1983 1984-1993 1994-2003 2004-2013 1948-1953 1954-1963 1964-1973 1974-1983 1984-1993 1994-2003 1948-1953 1954-1963 1964-1973 1974-1983 1984-1993 1994-2003 Установлены статистически значимые различия в СП смертности от ЗНО и всех опухолей при содержании плутония > 0,50 кБк у мужчин при сравнении с группой < 0,10 кБк. Проведен крупный мета-анализ по изучению влияния профессионального облучения в низких дозах на риск смертности от солидных опухолей [20]. Выявлена небольшая гетерогенность между исследованиями риска смертности от опухолей ЦНС (Р=0,31, I 2 =11,9 %).…”
Section: результаты и обсуждениеunclassified