2008
DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.41823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dose inhaled versus standard dose oral form of anti-tubercular drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was a retrospective analysis of primary pharmacokinetic data from three original studies published by Conte et al, O'Brien et al, and Katiyar et al (17)(18)(19). Details about subjects' characteristics, informed consent, and study design are fully available in those publications (17)(18)(19). Briefly, the study by Conte et al (17) included 80 adult volunteers without TB, i.e., 20 men with AIDS, 20 men without AIDS, 20 women with AIDS, and 20 women without AIDS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a retrospective analysis of primary pharmacokinetic data from three original studies published by Conte et al, O'Brien et al, and Katiyar et al (17)(18)(19). Details about subjects' characteristics, informed consent, and study design are fully available in those publications (17)(18)(19). Briefly, the study by Conte et al (17) included 80 adult volunteers without TB, i.e., 20 men with AIDS, 20 men without AIDS, 20 women with AIDS, and 20 women without AIDS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth stressing that an increment of the Soluplus ® concentration from 3% w / v to 10% w / v was required for the co-encapsulation of both RIF and CUR. Then, the RIF concentration was 10 mg/mL since it is clinically relevant for a pulmonary dosage form taking into account that the RIF concentration in an inhalable formulation could be approximately 100-fold lower than in an oral dosage form [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%