The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low dose hyper-radiosensitivity in metastatic tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a series of experiments initiated in the mid-1980s [28,29] have shown that the LQ model fails to predict the cell response to very small doses of radiation (below 0.5Á1 Gy). This hypersensitivity to low doses has been shown to exist in vivo both in normal tissues [28Á31] and in tumours [32,33] as well as in a wide range of cell lines studied in vitro [34Á42]. Experiments are still performed in order to establish the mechanism of the hypersensitivity at low doses, but it seems that it has a molecular origin, being an adaptive response to radiation damage, similar to other stress responses [43Á45].…”
Section: Mathematical Models To Describe Tissue Response To Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a series of experiments initiated in the mid-1980s [28,29] have shown that the LQ model fails to predict the cell response to very small doses of radiation (below 0.5Á1 Gy). This hypersensitivity to low doses has been shown to exist in vivo both in normal tissues [28Á31] and in tumours [32,33] as well as in a wide range of cell lines studied in vitro [34Á42]. Experiments are still performed in order to establish the mechanism of the hypersensitivity at low doses, but it seems that it has a molecular origin, being an adaptive response to radiation damage, similar to other stress responses [43Á45].…”
Section: Mathematical Models To Describe Tissue Response To Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, it has emerged in many cell lines of both tumour and normal tissues [4], as well as in human metastatic tumours [5]. Its possible application to irradiate radioresistant tumours using ultrafractionated schemes has been investigated [5][6][7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, it has emerged in many cell lines of both tumour and normal tissues [4], as well as in human metastatic tumours [5]. Its possible application to irradiate radioresistant tumours using ultrafractionated schemes has been investigated [5][6][7]. The LDHRS influence on the normal tissue response in fractionated regimes [8] and in low-dose fractionated radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy [9] has also been investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement in radiobiological understanding has for a long time lagged behind this technological development, but it is expected to play a more significant role in the further advancement of radiotherapy for both curative and palliative care. The favorable outcomes of some pilot studies on radioresistant malignant tumors (8 patients), recurrent breast carcinoma (17 patients), and glioblastoma multiforme (103 patients) 2,3,14 not only demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of the PRDR technique for these body sites but also provided convincing evidence to support future large scale and=or randomized clinical trials to determine the efficacy of the PRDR technique for other recurrent and potentially radioresistant cancers.…”
Section: Opening Statementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The rich in-vitro and in-vivo experimental results have laid a strong radiobiological foundation for the PRDR technique and these have been used to guide pilot studies to find optimal doses, dose rates, and fractionation schemes for particular body sites. 2,3,8,14,15 A clear advantage of the PRDR technique over conventional radiotherapy is the reduced normal tissue damage at lower dose rates, which has offered hope for some recurrent patients with severe and=or life threatening symptoms, who have been otherwise considered unsuitable for re-irradiation with conventional radiotherapy. The fact that many radioresistant tumor cells exhibit higher RHS=IRR ratios at lower doses and dose rates 6 also suggests that the PRDR technique may be a better choice than conventional radiotherapy for some recurrent cancers because of the possible existence of such radioresistant tumor cells.…”
Section: Opening Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%