2013
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dose aspirin vs low-dose aspirin plus low-intensity warfarin in thromboprophylaxis: a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open, controlled trial in patients positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (ALIWAPAS)

Abstract: ISRCTN81818945; http://isrctn.org/.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Trials with clinical outcomes are ideal; however, when APS trials with clinical outcomes have succeeded, the numbers have been relatively small, e.g. 334 patients in five RCTs on treatment for APS-associated recurrent miscarriage in the meta-analysis by Mak et al [75], and trials with larger recruitment targets have proved challenging [76,77]. The appropriateness or otherwise of the use of surrogate markers in clinical trials was considered in an editorial review by Svennson et al, who, after supporting their use in fatal diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, went on to say that they felt this approach was justified: 'in the case of very rare diseases, (where) validation of hard end points may take an unreasonable time to complete' [78].…”
Section: Rcts Of Doacs In Apsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trials with clinical outcomes are ideal; however, when APS trials with clinical outcomes have succeeded, the numbers have been relatively small, e.g. 334 patients in five RCTs on treatment for APS-associated recurrent miscarriage in the meta-analysis by Mak et al [75], and trials with larger recruitment targets have proved challenging [76,77]. The appropriateness or otherwise of the use of surrogate markers in clinical trials was considered in an editorial review by Svennson et al, who, after supporting their use in fatal diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, went on to say that they felt this approach was justified: 'in the case of very rare diseases, (where) validation of hard end points may take an unreasonable time to complete' [78].…”
Section: Rcts Of Doacs In Apsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adequate strategy for the primary prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) remains very controversial [1][2][3][4]. However, experts at the 13th International Congress on antiphospholipid antibodies have advocated the use of low-dose aspirin for primary prophylaxis of thrombosis in aPL carriers with high risk profiles such as lupus anticoagulant (LA) positivity or triple positivity (positivity of LA, anticardiolipin [aCL] and of anti-β2-glycoprotein-I [β2GPI] antibodies) or isolated persistently positive anticardiolipin antibodies aCL at medium-high titers [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no difference in the thrombosis risk between the two groups. However, the risk of bleeding was higher among patients receiving the combination therapy [42]. ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME…”
Section: Anticoagulation In Primary Thromboprophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%